So says… SCIENCE!
I guess this is why everyone hate moderates — they’re weak. We should crush them. I don’t know whether that would be good or evil, but we will be stronger for it according to Science!.
Now Science! needs to look into whether being good or evil makes fish more likely to listen to your commands.
Yeah, but what happens when you think evil thoughts while doing good?
Thinking evil thoughts while doing good…is bad, whereas thinking good thoughts while doing evil…is good. Didn’t you ever read 1984?
Evil, schmevil…I look GOOD in a goatee!
I don’t hate moderates. They may be dumb and easily misled, after all many of them were tricked into voting for a “moderate” Obama, but as the Obama Mis-Administration has amply demonstrated, Lefty Commies are much worst.
Hopefully, moderates have gained some intelligence by now and realize how dumb they were for voting for Obama. However, they are moderates after all…
Even if they do it doesn’t matter. They have short memories and even shorter attention spans. As long as Dems and RINOs wave something shiny in front of them they’ll keep thinking they are being “reasonable” and above partisan bickering.
Bwhahahahahaha, I am strong minions! I will do evil before that awesome Frnak finds out!
Monkey!!!
Bwhahahahah
“They have short memories and even shorter attention spans. As long as Dems and RINOs wave something shiny in front of them they’ll keep thinking they are being “reasonable” and above partisan bickering.”
How true, FormerHostage. Me, I’ve become even more partisan in my bickering. Democrats are so wrong about just about everything you have to be partisan. For Dems, bi-partisanship means “do exactly what we want and forget your principles.”
Which means maybe we need to put moderates on the “punch their ugly faces on sight” list.
Good = strong. That explains Fred Thompson and Chuck Norris.And Frnack.
Evil=strong? Reid, Frank, Pelosi, Kennedy, Obama. and Soros are not really thought of as powerhouses, are they/ Well, maybe Mbo.
Now Science! needs to look into whether being good or evil makes fish more likely to listen to your commands.
I haven’t done the math yet, but..
Aquaman is the most well known fish commander.
Aquaman is about as wimpy as you can be and still be a superhero.
The more good or evil you are means you are stronger (from our original proposition).
Therefore, Aquaman is a moderate as he is weak. He might try to do good, but since he’s such a wimp, he doesn’t do as much good as he could.
Therefore, uhhhh. what was the question?
Oh yeah.
Being more good or more evil means you can’t command fish, so a balance between the two would seem to be the best way to go to command fish.
Carneige museum- wrong head on their dinosaur for 40 + years.
Atom is the smallest measurable particle circa 1900.
Global warming is ALIVE. 2010
Don’t you just wonder what science will tell us tomorrow?
As Granny Yokum always said, “Good is better than evil, ’cause it’s nicer!”
Then she’d haul off and slug someone who needed it with her gigantic Popeye-the-Sailor fists, with catastrophic results.
An important lesson for us all.
now we know why Michelle has those arms
But, No_Mo_Bama, that still doesn’t explain why she has an Adam’s Apple.
heh. did anyone else notice the sample size used in the experiments that all those conclusions are based upon?
Yeah, Axe, I noticed that too. Of all the things you could infer from that study, the fact that being good or evil makes you stronger ought to be at the bottom of the list.
What I got from the article, was that the person running the experiment was a complete and utter moron.
http://www.lil-abner.com/mammy.html
Oops, sorry. I meant ‘Mammy’ Yokum.
“Evil will always triumph over Good because Good is STUPID!”
Just curious. Did giving money to UNICEF count as a Good act or Evil act? Pretty evil in my book but the research was probably a liberal moron.
Mammy Yokum would kick Dark Helmet’s ass!
But yeah, giving money to UNICEF wouldn’t be much of an incentive to me, either.
One can be good and evil but never evil and good.