4 Comments

  1. Unfortunately, point #9 at the ending of the article presents the same old tired “the science is settled” balderdash:

    ” . . . carbon dioxide, which is directly linked to global warming”

    Really? Not by those hockey-stick graphs, I hope. Or the debunked ones by Al Gore which, in reality, prove carbon dioxide levels rise after warming periods, not before.

    I’ve seen articles by physicists who calculate that the carbon dioxide molecules in our atmosphere are equivalent to a pea on a football field. Or less. There can be no “greenhouse effect” from carbon, since it does not act like a glass ceiling at all. Most photons pass right by it.

    H2O is enormously more abundant in the atmosphere, but is ignored by Global Warming scare literature because it would be counterproductive (i.e., counterProgductive) to tell people to fear water, and to try to tax water.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.