The interior of America gets redder and the Democrats increasingly are being concentrated on the coasts. Do you know what this means? Maybe eventually we can reach our ultimate goal: Pushing the Democrats into the sea. It will be great, because there is not voting if you are in the sea and you can’t run from political office there so we’ll finally be rid of Democrat influence. They will probably keep yelling stuff at us, though, from the sea like, “Let me out of here!”, “I’m all wet and I blame the rich!”, and “I’m a Democrat; I want free stuff!” which will be annoying. Also, we’ll want to put up signs on all beaches that say, “Caution: Democrats.” And they’ll probably get in the way of commercial fishing. And Aquaman will be really mad at us.
Still, it will make drawing political maps really easy since the sea is already blue.
Aquaman is a democrat probably.
Wait a minute! Consider these seemingly unrelated items:
1. A resurgence of conservatism is pushing libtards to the coasts.
2. According to libtards free market capitalism is causing Global Warming.
3. Global warming will melt the polar ice caps.
4. Melting ice caps will flood the coastlines.
Rove! You magnificent bastard!
FormerHostage:
Hey! I used to live close the the sea!
Ex-wife still does. Hmmm…
Rove! You magnificent bastard!
It could explain Obama’s “when the rise of the oceans began to slow” quote. Even the ocean recoils from liberalism.
Even with Cthulhu on its side.
Yhe heartland has farms and fields. That means hard work. Hard work is to a democrat like garlic to a vampire. The coast has beeches. Beeches have lounge chairs. Democrats like to louinge around and get free stuff. I’ve used Science! to explain this. Where’s my grant?
One word: harpoons.
Pros:
* No more liberals!
* Lots of food for sharks and other predators!
* Lots of scraps for crabs, lobsters, and the like!
* Beachfront property for the rich!
* Our submariners can practice sonar with the liberals!
Cons:
* Shrimp fishermen will be hardest hit. Trawling the bottom of the ocean will bring in hundreds of tons of liberals and Chomsky books.
* Coastal cities like Baltimore and San Francisco will require years of cleanup, but we can contract that out to someone.
I approve of this plan!
As long as we impose a moratorium on liberal rescue efforts, I can go along with this. AND, it has to be just as devastating as the drilling moratorium has been to Gulf coast industries.
Maybe we can just shuttle all of them out to shuttered oil rigs. Or ferry them to Brazil.
And this time we won’t let them dry off and come back like we did with New Orleans.
Now that the Libbies are concentrated near the coatlines, lets use their wet feet, dry feet policy to revoke their citizenship once the set foot in the ocean.
At the coastlines?
“They look thirsty!”
“Well, let’s give them something to drink! To the cliffs!”
Perhaps this should be our message to the Democrats: “This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.”
Frank,
There is a problem with the political color scheme and it bugs me a lot. Democrats are just commie’s in drag. Commies are Reds. We have been coloring the maps wrong for years. The good guys should be blue!
But if the sharks eat the Democrats and turn the oceans red, we will have a chance to paint the land blue and fix the problem.
Are you with me?
I am kind of worried about the health of the sharks though…
I think the sharks will be okay. Sharks aren’t bottom feeders.
Maybe someday the trees will shout to say, “there is a Democrat behind me”
@Dennis: Lying liar media. From Wikipedia:
“This unofficial system of political colors used in the United States is the reverse of that in most other long-established democracies, where blue represents right-wing and conservative parties, while red represents left-wing and social democrat parties.”
Apparently, noted liberal weenie Tim Russert is credited with coining the term red state/blue state.
I spose I learned US history before it became extremely politically correct. I was taught that Red, white and blue in our flag represent liberals, independents and conservatives, respectively (by the modern definitions of liberal and conservative).
What wonderful irony…polluting the sea with democrats.
Dennis, Burmashave:
Before the 2000 election, the TV networks alternated color-coding the presidential election. In 1996, for instance, states that voted for the Democrat were red, and states that voted for the Republican were blue. In 1992, it was red=Republican, dlue=Democrat. In 1988, it was red=Democrat, blue=Republican.
The prolonged 2000 election made the colors stick. Not disputing whether Russert first coined the term to refer to specific parties in 2000, but prior to 2000, it was an alternating scheme. At least back to 1980, the first election coverage I worked when I was with an ABC radio affiliate. Unrelated, but “The ’80 Vote” was the term ABC used for coverage. Some of you older ones may remember that.
I heard all the lefties are trying to have a rally in Washington this weekend to counter Glenn Beck’s ‘Restoring Honor’ rally last month.
Coincidentally, there’s a terrific line of torrential rain storms moving up the coast towards DC this weekend.
Will their counter-revolution be rained out, or will it only provide them with enough muddy ground for a Woodstock flash-back moment?
Short term plan, move the lefties to the coastal cities.
Long term plan, starve’em out!
Works for me!
It also means “we” in the midwest control food production. Just sayin
COOL! When the icecaps melt, libtards drown. How perfect is this! We solve the liberal infestation, feed the fish, create a tree hugger favorite in population control, clean the gene pool, AND create jobs (someone is gonna have to clean up the cities when the water recedes). It’s WIN-WIN-WIN-WIN-WIN!