[High Praise! to Bad Science, Daily Caller, and Ace of Spades HQ]
_______________
I think what they think is this: Romney won the first debate because he contradicted everything Obama said. Hence, the winner of any debate is the one who contradicts the most. Biden contradicted the most, ergo he wins.
But… that’s not the rule, of course. That’s… what’s the word? Stupid.
And that’s not what Romney did. Romney didn’t just contradict Obama – he contradicted him and then offered a series of facts which supported his contradiction. In many exchanges, Obama would make an assertion – just an assertion, unsupported, and just one – and then Romney would make three supported claims undermining Obama’s assertion…
Romney did not win his debate because he contradicted Obama a lot. Obama contradicted Romney just as much, of course. Romney won the debate because he was in command, fluent with facts, clear and persuasive in explaining his underlying understanding of the economy, friendly, warm, intelligent, and… extremely presidential.
_______________


