I have a theory. This theory which belongs to me is my theory. My theory is along the following lines. All Norwegian mounds are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
I think that shifting the focus from mounds as primarily mortuary structures to mounds as primarily ritual structures that were sometimes also used for burials, we can get closer to understanding what lies behind the mound phenomenon in general, or sumthin’.
And when I awoke I was alone.
This bird had flown jack.
So I lit a fire,
Isn’t it good Norwegian wood? 🪵
Fun Fact: Joe Biden always felt Beatles songs had hidden messages if you played them jack-words.
I have a theory. This theory which belongs to me is my theory. My theory is along the following lines. All Norwegian mounds are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too.
I’ll bet Oppo has some theories about Norwegian mounds, if you know what I mean, eh, eh!!
Lovely curvage, the Norwegian mound.
Gee, it’s been so long since I’ve thought about that.
My thoughts were that the hight of the mound gave pitchers an unfair advantage and there must have been a lot of uneventful 1-0 games in those days.
Sometimes you feel like a nut. The Norwegian Iron Age don’t.
I think that shifting the focus from mounds as primarily mortuary structures to mounds as primarily ritual structures that were sometimes also used for burials, we can get closer to understanding what lies behind the mound phenomenon in general, or sumthin’.
Sorry, it’s Ferrous Bjøjlår’s day off.