12 Comments

  1. Laurence Simon:
    George Allen DID NOT call his opponent Jim Webb a Macaca.
    He called the young Indian-American man (who was taping Allen’s speech for Webb at a campaign event) a Macaca, as noted in the link you yourself provided.
    If you are going to write a dumb joke with a violent punch-line, can you at least get your facts straight first so the joke makes some vague amount of sense?
    Oh, I forgot. You write for IMAO. Making sense (or being funny) is frowned upon on here.
    Peace,
    Monkey Faced Liberal

  2. Damian,
    The typically emasculated American Liberal Male can’t rego what has been surgically removed already.
    All they can do is rant, rave and make fools out of themselves a la Michael MOOre, Howard Dean, Harry Reid, John F. Kerry, Teddy (glub, glub)Kennedy and the rest of their ilk.
    They can’t make a point unless it’s at someone else’s expense, and they never allow facts to impact on any decisions they might make, if they indeed can make a concrete decision. Because you see they believe in NOTHING. No higher spiritual power, no government, no family, no order.
    That’s wrong they do believe in something. They believe in themselves and what they feel. think and want. That is their creed and dogma. Selfishness, hedonism, and a good helping of tunnel vision.
    That’s what makes reading them so entertaining, they can’t buy a clue and it’s great fodder for articles and books. No one would believe for a minute that people actually say the things they do.
    Just sit back and enjoy the play, after all “the plays the thing.”

  3. Gunga,
    “Fake but Accurate” is only allowed to be used by liberals. Like “tolerance,” it means one thing for libs and something else for human beings with at least two brain cells to rub together.

  4. MFL, you sub-human piece of excrement, what have I told you about addressing your betters? What ever diseased and deranged crackhead shot you out of her poisoned womb seems to have forgotten to teach you manners.
    When addressing those of greater intelligence, wisdom and moral character than yourself, you use the words “Sir” and “Ma’am” and keep a more civil tongue. Luckily we have the moral fiber to not behead you as your Muslim Masters would for such disrespect. Count your lucky stars, you festering pile of porcine waste.
    So, you putrid anal cyst, do as you’ve been told and sit your inferior ass back down at the kiddie table. Stop interrupting the adults when they are talking with your childish tantrums, you dried-up manseed stain.
    War and Victory.
    -DesertElephant

  5. DesertElephant:
    I got to give you props — your insults this time were more creative and less cliche than usual.
    “festering pile of porcine waste” and “putrid anal cyst” were especially good.
    “sub-human piece of excrement” was a bit weaker though. Does that mean that the piece of excrement itself is sub-human, or that it was excreted by a sub-human. Not clear.
    Also, is a sub-human piece of excrement really that much worse than a human piece of excrement? Difficult to judge.
    Also, I see where you are going with the whole “addressing those of greater intelligence”, but it doesn’t really belong in a thread where I have just pointed out that a IMAO writer got the facts wrong on something where the facts are available in the link he himself provided.
    But keep up the good work. Your posts are funnier than most of the stuff on this site!
    Peace,
    Monkey Faced Liberal

  6. MFL… if you deign speak again, it best be prefaces with te word sir. And, as usual, your debatable cognitive abilities are shown as being lacking once again.
    Despite his slip up, you still shouldn’t try to talk in any manner other than respectfully to your moral and intellectual superiors.
    I realise that I must be paining you with terrible headaches by using multi-syllabic words, but the thought of your underdeveloped head pounding brings me incredible joy.
    Now, go fornicate solo you developmentally stunted catamite.
    War and Victory!
    -DesertElephant

  7. DesertElephant:
    I have noticed you use a word incorrectly twice, and I thought you might appreciate it if I point out this error to you.
    When you write “multi-syllabic” words I think you mean to write “multisyllable” words.
    Syllabic is generally used as an adjective, meaning “of or relating to syllables”.
    You could use it as a noun, but then it would mean a “A syllabic sound” as in the most sonorant segment of a syllable, like the i and l in riddle.
    Ain’t linguistics fun!
    Peace,
    Monkey Faced Liberal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.