The ironically-named Center for Public Integrity posted 935 of the Bush administration’s statements about Iraq that it claims “methodically propagated erroneous information over the two years beginning on Sept. 11, 2001”.
In response, IMAO has created its own website which lists all the methodically propagated accurate information uttered by Democrats since 9/11.
Screenshot in the extended entry…
We promise to update daily, or even more frequently, if necessary.
I love how the “Center for Public Integrity” only lists 8 specific issues (http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/Default.aspx?src=project_home&context=key_false_statements&id=946)
I suppose they were just repeated a lot.
According to this “study”, anyone who didn’t get 100% on every test in school is a FILTHY LIAR! And if you ever had an essay question and got a 100% on it, but you didn’t answer the question they thought you should have been asked, you are a FILTHY LIAR!
nobodies in history of wrld has toldz more lies bout a war thanz booosh. he is masta o liez jus like masta shak is masta of makn deliciouz shake at burga king. he he he he he
Quick! Someone get me a translator for Wrrrr so I can make fun of him for saying whatever it is he is trying to say!
Noone else in the history of the world has told more lies than Bush. He is the master of lies like . Ha ha.
Noone else in the history of the world has told more lies than Bush. He is the master of lies like [insert 10 year old culture reference of choice]. Ha ha.
(stupid html reader)
What’s that wrrr’ing-clacking sound? I thought you broken and scattered, Wrrrr. If not, make it so.
intrstn fax bout booosh. peeps used get angreez lix clovafeeld monsta if u seh booosh suxx or booosh lieaz bout iraqq. nowly peepz just accep it – nah gets fiery angreis no more. even rite wingaz accep it sumwhat. dis meanz that it has becomez common knowldg that boosh is a liar pants on fire fella. has bcum acceppable to bash booosh. iz awesum faxx.
He may try to blame “stupid html reader” for his incorrect post, but the post exposes Wrrrr as being a FILTHY LIAR!
IMAO needs a drivel/crap filter.
http://www.cafepress.com/mcteeth
question: Is the world not a safer place now that Saddam is out of power? He waged two wars of aggression, had facilities with which he could easily make chemical weapons, and wanted to maintain his power as a regional leader in the middle East at all costs.
“Wrrr” isn’t his name, it’s the sound coming from his battery-powered lover. Master Shake’s “typing with one hand” observation from another thread explains the hopeless spelling and grammar.
Reuters misses again!
Much of their case for war has since been discredited, in large part because no Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were found despite the administration’s prewar warnings that Iraq’s arsenal presented a threat to its neighbors and U.S. interests.
So all those Kurds died from someone else’s poison gas then? Saddam was just holding those SCUDS for some other pariah?
If Reuters keeps this up, then I smell a merger with the NYT.
Speaking of that seditious rag, I wonder if CPI has a listing of all the flat-out lies they’ve written & printed since 2000? I have a feeling that CPI would have a list a hell of a lot larger than 380,000 words.
You really have to wonder at the sheer idiocy when the leftards can’t find something better to do than to smear a group because they dislike them enough to viciously lie under the guise of being some foolish “institute”. They claim the erroneous statements were “assertions that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium to build a nuclear weapon (He was), to warnings of a link between Iraq and the al Qaeda militant network blamed for the Sept. 11 attacks (There was. And is. Did they forget who the insurgents are & who’s training them?).
Is there really anything different that Bush said about Hussein than Clinton said about Hussein?
For 8 years we were told that Hussein was this huge risk to the world, that he was working on WMDs, that the US military had to be deployed to the Middle East and that Hussein had to be stopped.
So maybe Bush just actually believed what Clinton was saying.
So maybe Bush just actually believed what Clinton was saying.
waz controlln SADDAM jus fine with bombs and inspectaz. war was stoopid just lik alanor b stoopid.
Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium to build a nuclear weapon (He was)
falses. fiffly LIE! was no wmdz. was false need for warz. rush to warz by booosh. culd have bombd he anytimez. did nah needz to happenz in ’03. false. LIEZ! misses alanor iz poo on she fax
No one wants to talk about the “Silent Minority” regarding the war. Many (like me) are not upset with Bush for de-throning Saddam (for WHATEVER f*cking reason), but for not raking the country clean afterwards. Like: close their borders and form a line with 5000 tanks and 400,000 US troups and go house-to-house, hole-to-hole and rid the stinking place of every weapon.
On the other hand, there’s still time to do just that – and we have been, haven’t we? I say, go George!! On this matter, you’ve still got my vote. On most others, NOT.
Jimmy, Boooosh shuld listen to Powell peep rite and bring bigga amry? Mighta been betta resultz
Powell wuld been such betta prez than Booosh. Booosh is lik tiny piece o burnd popcorn but Powell is a whole behg o deliciouz popcornz.
Wrrr. “Yay! I found my missing aquarium pump! I can re-inflate my girlfriend! Wrrrrrrrrr
Forgive if I’m stating the obvious, but for anyone following along – while Wrrr may have originally been a Paul supporter who found his way here, I’m pretty sure he’s a parody now, kind of like the difference between Cthulhu Monkey Faced Liberal and the actual Monkey Faced Liberal that shows up once in a while.
Yay! I found my missing aquarium pump! I can re-inflate my girlfriend
i can has numerouss hot grlz. they iz nah fishes. grrls r hot 4 liberallz nah 4 stoopid rite wingaz.
#21 — wrrrrrrrrrrrr… I imagine, when you actually talk to real girl (which is, what, whenever you ask your mom to make you a grilled cheese?)you get the same response as you get here, which is: ARE YOU STILL HERE?
uh oh!! booosh gonna lose 2 warz now. afghanz turn to poo1 Hoog rize in attax. whaddyathnxboutthat?
“According to retired Lt. Gen. David Barno, former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and now director of the Near East South Asia Center for Strategic Studies, National Defense University, acts of violence in Afghanistan rose from 900 in 2004 to 8,950 last year. Over the same span, roadside bomb attacks increased from 325 to 1,469; suicide bombings rose from 3 to 130.
A total of 107 U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan in 2007 — the most ever”
ARE YOU STILL HERE?
thinx i will b herez foreva. i putz mista j’s imao in i bookmarx. i gotz ova 5,813 bookmarx. how bout u dood? i also gotz tons o feeds in i feeddemonz. elps i track all nooz
“A total of 107 U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan in 2007 — the most ever”
My heart goes out to those 107 families, but lets look at this in a historical context.
In WWII and WWI we lost that many men every day, probably more.
In Vietnam we lost more troops than that on a weekly basis.
Seriously, do you realize how little 107 dead is in the larger scheme of things? The Soviet army won with casualties like that before breakfast on a good day. I think we can win with an ANNUAL casualty rate of 107.
Here you go , Wr. I thought you might get some education out of this…
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us; Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,334 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden’s head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing, yet Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us
President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran and North Korea -without firing a shot- and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
so, 2 put itz in wrdz u can unastan, “Booosh Kix Azz!!! Librulz & Dimucratz Sux at da ledershp!”
You’re welcome!
563,000 lives lost under the Democrats’ watch. That’s an average of about 9383 per year up to ’01… and thats not even excluding the years that Republicans were in control. I’m sure that if you can subtract those years, you’ll discover that the average death toll per year under Democrat mismanagement rises sharply.
As an added bonus, go ahead & factor in the people who died while on all those ambiguous missions during both of Clinton’s philandering terms in office.
You’re welcome!
thx so mooch for useles infoz and ww11 comparison tho i point iz thgzs r gettin rapdly worse in Afghan nah betta. talipoo is nah crushd as u seh.
this soundz jus lik wha happenz in iraqz when u rite wingaz was sehn same thingz b4 it gotz bad. u waz all like o rly? doncha worriez – but then thingz got rly rly srlsly bad and booosh had to send more usa solda peeps.
i jus nah wanz afghan to turn 2 poo u knoa whaz i mean? diss is what dissent is all aboutz. gotsa keep our leadaz in chek. mak supa sur they b on topz o thngs. it so so so so so so so so stoopid to jus assum they doin in rite. wld nah b 1st time booosh totlly fux it all up. well, he bout to fux up Afghan. y u so f113ing dumb u cannah c that?
it sown so much lik afghan head towardz same exactly probs that iraQq has in 06-07.
i iz nah gonna listn to u ass peeps sehn nah worreez. i iz gonna complain and complain loud and seh look look! is nah goin wellz. cuzz i care bout troopz. i nah waan they blowz up. i heart they lik they iz i frendz. they fite fite so hardz alwehz so i fite fite 2 mehk sure dis admenstruatoon nah let they downz.
CUZZ IZ WAZ DEMOCRTS VOICES o DISSENT that gets more troopey peeps in Iraqq. DEMOCRTS Fix IT!1! You blind as f*88ing bat lozerz were all lik oh oh oh it is AweSUM in IraqQ. u waantd democrts to shut it even though they was speakn troof to powa. meanwhilz u cowardz was bizzee acceptn whateva govment seh as troof.
U losers was all liks believin cheney that it was giong so swell. u losaz was full sh1t then & u r full o the sh1t nowz. as usualz u got sh1t in u fromz bottomz o feet to sh1t pourin out u mouf n earz.
once gainz it is gonna take indeez n democrts to point out the bullzshitz of how this menstratoon handlez war while u stoopid f!!8kers just accep liez and liez and liez.
u’r welcum!
Wrrrr, you’re amazing. Where did you learn to type like that? It’s like, I can read it, but I can’t, all at the same time!
Yeah. We’re the ones accepting lies, because I’ve never known a Democrat to lie, especially not under oath & expect the nation to believe it.
Apparently I hit upon a touchy subject about how well the Dems handle the tough problems; that is, to close their eyes, cover their ears & go, “LALALALALALALALA!!! I CAN’T HEAR YOOOOOO!!! when someone calls them on their perpetual blundering. But hey, those 562,000 are nothing compared to the few thousand who died under Bush’s administration, none of whom were drafted, BTW.
Sorry Wrrrrysome- I didn’t mean to hit such a sensitive nerve with you.
Now I can understand why you curse so much; it’s all that righteous indignation & having to bear the burden of always being correct!
I’m so proud of you guys (Alano and Pantera) for talking rationally. I can’t even take this kid seriously. It’s like the internet equivelant of wearing your pants 2 feet below your asscrack and a too-small hat cocked sideways.
#28 – Posted by: Wrrrr on January 26, 2008 01:29 AM
My god, you mean he’s not a parody?
r2,
u heart troops rite so y nah b worriez bout risin afghan attax? waz all i sayn. alanor n pants responz was just lik “oh rly? well who cares at least 500000 troopz nah dead lik ww11. shut up wrrrr u poophead. onlee we heart troopz nah u.” i summrize but it seemz lik they sehn thoz kind of self riteous bs cosas. iz ok tho cuzz i can pwn themz anydeh o week.
you mean he’s not a parody
maybeh wal iz parody of a rite winga losa. doez u W standz 4 widestance? :———-D
iz timez 4 noo post mista j. iz noo deh. wehk up lazee
I must agree with the whirlybird on one point. We should have controlled Hussein with bombs. Every palace, every military installation, and every government facility should have been reduced to rubble. The only way to win a war is to fight like you mean it.
I thought we would do that, but Bush has been cowed by the lft wingaz aka dumb asses. While he seems to understand the importance of fighting jihadis, he just doesn’t seem to have the balls to prosecute the war as it must be in order to win. Rolling into Baghdad was not enough! You do not sting an enemy, you defeat and subdue them. Otherwise they remain dangerous. The majority of the Iraqi people may not be our enemy, but they allowed the enemy to live in their midst. This makes it necessary to regard them all as enemies until the wheat is separated from the chaff.
Bush and Rumsfeld moved us into a post-war posture way before we were ready. We wouldn’t be in the position we are today, if we had continued to conduct ourselves as a nation at war. Unfortunately the PC police began calling the shots. Political correctness is killing us! We need to chop the head off that monster now!
I guess I could have just said “What Jimmy said!” Of course the George I would prefer to cheer on would be George S. Patton Jr. Unfortunately, even though he was the most astute U.S. foreign policy expert of the 20th century, he died in 1945 and remains dead to this day. If he has been reincarnated as he believed he would, he hasn’t made his reappearance on the American landscape. Even Petraeus falls far short of the example set by Patton.
onlee we heart troopz nah u
Then ask them what the want. You might want to do it in correct English though because even those not deployed are too busy pulling 12 hr shifts, taking college classes so they can commission instead of just re-enlisting, and taking care of their families they serve to protect to try and figure out what the hell you’re talking about.
Although phonetically Boooosh is a lot cooler than Bush
hey Wrrr, where do you get so much time to type like that? Or do you have a program that does it for you.
Also, the democratic plan was not to put more troops in Iraq. According to democrats the war was “unwinnable”. They wanted us to pull out and quit. They’ve all hated the surge from day 1. According to your theory, the democrats would have supported the surge. Obviusly, they didn’t.
Also, while I see your point that it’s good to put the screws on youe leader, there’s a difference between forcing him to win(what republicans did) and what forcing him to lose (what the democrats did). There’s a big difference between these two.
“You know you’re doing something right when you’ve reduced hordes of liberals to blind, sputtering rage.”
-Ann Coulter
I still can’t believe he’s an actual person.
I mean we make fun of Paul supporters for being nuts, but this is actual Bellevue territory here.
Look, we’re debating Jar Jar Binks. At minimum, if he is real, everybody owes George Lucas an apology.
WTH?
I submitted a post and got a message about the blog owner needing to review it?
Is that because of the links in the post? Anyone have this happen before?
Never mind…
RTP-
Yeah, that’s happens from time to time. I think it’s a program that gets activated from time to time when especially vitriolic trolls start leaving the truly vile crap.
I remember last year some bitch actually commented that she hoped the wife one of the IMAO “staff” members would get raped just because the horrible she-troll couldn’t understand why so many of us thought partial-birth abortions were particularly barbaric. I guess we kept missing that article in the Constitution that clearly supports it. Apparently, that drove the trollette to such anger that, had she not already been a dessicated sack of dumpster squeezins’, she would’ve been crying tears of impotent rage.
My guess was that she slithered over from DK, where they celebrate the death of Reagan like it’s some kind of liberal holiday, wish atrocities on the troops, and wrote beautiful eulogies for a psychopath who gunned down random kids at V-T.
Classy bunch, those ones.
Dude, Rockthrowingpeasant.
That was like the Iraq version of Nekama’s hammer. Rock on!
Does anyone know if the Center for Public Integrity has compiled such a comprehensive list of all the falsehoods generated by the Presidents Clinton during the 90’s? I mean, since CPI holds truth & integrity in such high regard, it should be just a matter of course for them to do.
Perhaps I can ask them directly. Surely they’ll be ab;e to accommodate me.