This happens all the time.
Because of what we all know, even meticulously sober and straightforward articles about Harris– like the following — suggest all sorts of naughty jokes.
J. Robert Smith wrote a reasoned, analytical article in American Thinker titled “The Unbearable Lightweightness of Kamala Harris.”
Yet either he or I — or both of us — couldn’t avoid language that evokes her well-known means of advancement in politics. Why is that? Sub-lib-men-all suggestion?
My excerpts (well, except for his advocating for “cooler heads”):
No doubt Harris has a prominent seat at the White House table . . .
If Harris is trying to lead from behind the scenes, to date, she’s doing an awful job.
Politicians . . . keep wet fingers in the wind.
[Democrats are] itching to set precedent.
[She was] thrust into the limelight . . .
… She sure was …
We need to . . . keep the pressure on . . . If that gap happens, we need to close it fast. . . . We need to work our tushes off to that end.
. . . a short-term Harris bump . . .
!
Phrase of the day!
She is a political grifter and barely functioning hack who rose up the ladder based on her victim status and who she slept with. Definitely Presidential material for the Democrats.
What’s going down with Kamala these days?
She’s taking criticism but she knows how to…suck it up!
{Cue Dr. Evil}
If Harold and Kumar can go to White Castle why can’t Kamala go to the border??
She’s afraid all those Mexicans will give her the Willies.
Oh, Lord, I’m sorry about that joke — please look after them pygmies.
Are you referring to the ”gasp” slick willies??