In New York City, the number of people under “active monitoring” for Ebola symptoms has tripled.
Just waiting for Obama to brag about “creating jobs in the medical profession”.
2 Comments
Does “active monitoring” mean someone is watching their whiny press conferences, in which they moan and complain about the harsh injustice of being monitored? “We were selflessly doing good, and good-intentioned people can be trusted to self-monitor and instantly recognize if we are symptomatic, which we never will be because we are smarter than you are and cannot possibly have exposed ourselves to the virus inadvertently, and did I mention how wonderfully selfless and good we are so we would never, ever, risk exposing someone else to the virus; it’s inconceivable!” (And we can’t even hippie-punch their smug faces, because our knuckles could get scraped and come into contact with their possibly-infected blood.)
Un-punch-able Hippies?
Brrr! A cold shiver just ran down my spine!
Oh, wait, we could still throw rocks at them without making physical contact, right?
That’s all right then. (Phew!)
Does “active monitoring” mean someone is watching their whiny press conferences, in which they moan and complain about the harsh injustice of being monitored? “We were selflessly doing good, and good-intentioned people can be trusted to self-monitor and instantly recognize if we are symptomatic, which we never will be because we are smarter than you are and cannot possibly have exposed ourselves to the virus inadvertently, and did I mention how wonderfully selfless and good we are so we would never, ever, risk exposing someone else to the virus; it’s inconceivable!” (And we can’t even hippie-punch their smug faces, because our knuckles could get scraped and come into contact with their possibly-infected blood.)
Un-punch-able Hippies?
Brrr! A cold shiver just ran down my spine!
Oh, wait, we could still throw rocks at them without making physical contact, right?
That’s all right then. (Phew!)