Babesleaga Winners 1 : Week 6 Results and Standings

It all comes down to the final week. Let’s recap.

Results

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
187 votes · 187 answers

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
193 votes · 193 answers

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
190 votes · 190 answers

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Who do you prefer?
198 votes · 198 answers

Standings

ContestantsRecordTotal PointsAverage
Grace Kelly6 – 0 – 0740123.3
Morena Baccarin5 – 1 – 0699116.5
Evangeline Lilly4 – 2 – 0708118.0
Joan Severance4 – 2 – 0646107.7
Jane Seymour2 – 4 – 058096.7
Katherine Ross1 – 5 – 052387.2
Michelle Pfeiffer1 – 5 – 047479.0
Shakira1 – 5- – 044774.5

This week’s polls will all close on Sunday May 30th at 9:00 am.

  • 10:00 am Shakira vs Michelle Pfeiffer
  • 2:00 pm Joan Severance vs Evangeline Lilly
  • 6:00 pm Katherine Ross vs Jane Seymour
  • 8:00 pm Grace Kelly vs Morena Baccarin

Since There’s No Babesleaga Today

Lara Logan: ‘They’re Not Journalists. They’re Political Assassins’
YouTube | May 15, 2021 | American Thought Leaders – The Epoch Times

“Our profession today is unrecognizable,” says award-winning journalist Lara Logan.


“They’re not journalists. They’re political assassins, working on behalf of political operatives and propagandists,” Logan argues.

Friday Night Open Thread: Just Tryin’ To Drive Traffic to the Site

News Flash:

Great Tits Living in Cities Are Genetically Different From Great Tits in the Countryside
University of Glasgow via Phys.org | May 20, 2021

Great tits living in cities are genetically different from great tits in the countryside. Researchers made the discovery after a unique study where they examined populations of great tits in nine large European cities, including Glasgow.

The researchers compared the city bird genes with the genes of their relatives in the countryside. The findings, which are published today in Nature Communications, showed that it didn’t matter if the great tits lived in Barcelona, Malmö or Glasgow: in order to handle an environment created by humans, the city birds all evolved in a similar way.

The European research, which was led by Lund University in collaboration with researchers at the University of Glasgow, included a study of birds from Kelvingrove Park together with birds from around the forest in the University of Glasgow’s SCENE (Scottish Center for Ecology and the Natural Environment) facility, located near Loch Lomond.

The researchers found that different genes linked to important biological functions regulated by serotonin, including aggression and circadian rhythms, were found to have been selected and passed on from generation to generation in the city birds. In rural populations, these behaviors are also important, however, the genes that control them do not confer the same advantage as they do in an urban environment.

On a serious note, it reads like the rural birds do have the same genes, yet the behavior they express is not as advantageous. How does this make them genetically different?

(The article goes on to say “The researchers analyzed more than half a million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spread over the entire genome, and found that a handful of genes that had clearly changed in response to the urban environment.” But wouldn’t that be the lead paragraph, not just a virtual footnote?)

On an even more serious note, isn’t it about time to change the name of this bird? Surely people as afraid of researching and discussing it as they are of Uranus.

On an even less serious note:

Do you have something you’d like to share? A link? A joke? Some words of wisdom? A topic to discuss? It’s our nightly Open Thread, and you have the floor.