The next time a liberal shrieks “Saddam had no WMDs!” feel free to smack them with this book.
Smack them with the hardcover, not the paperback version. And if it’s a royal scumbag like Ted Kennedy or John Kerry whining that there were no WMDs, maybe it’s okay to drive some nails through the cover or glue some broken beer bottle bottoms to it.
And I totally believe James Frey, too! Just because there’s no “evidence” is no reason to disbelieve someone who says something you’d like to hear.
You’re confusing evidence with proof.
Notice how the lefties phrase their argument against going into Iraq–“we didn’t find any weapons”, or “there were no weapons when we got there.” Notice they never say “Saddam got rid of (or destroyed) his WMD’s.” Well, of course we didnt find any, and they weren’t there when we got there. All (or, at least, most) of them are in Syria. But, if Hollywood ever cared about the truth, then I guess Looney Clooney wouldn’t be able to make any more of his stupid movies, would he?
Hell no! I don’t want to get filthy hippie blood on such a fine book!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38213
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB80/
http://www.nysun.com/article/26514
There are three more sources for WMD’s in Iraq (although I haven’t had much time to read through the second one, so maybe it’s not too concrete).
Mr. So Right,
Who wants to hear what?
Blix said he had them.
France said he had them.
Germany said he had them.
UK said he had them.
He said he had them.
Hell, even China said he had them.
His general now says he had them.
So, according to you, of course he didn’t. That’s just silly.