I feel like I should say something about the Supreme Court nominee, but I don’t really know anything to say. She’s not a lesbian — the Obama administration is very clear on that — and she was never like a judge so she doesn’t have any legal opinions to analyze. That’s all I know. Still, if Obama nominated her, I doubt she’s all like, “Hey, you can’t do that; that’s not in the Constitution!” That’s something only crazy, right-wing judges say.
There are some rumors she used to live in a gingerbread house and kidnap children, but the Obama administration hasn’t denied those rumors like they did the lesbian ones. And she came in second in a national hot dog eating contest, though I’m not sure how that relates to a legal philosophy.
Yeah, I know so little I already had to start making stuff up. Really, though, Obama is replacing a liberal Justice with presumably another liberal and I don’t think there’s any chance we’ll like who he picks, so I’m not sure under what conditions am I supposed to care about this. So, by default, I am opposed to Ellen Kagan because Obama likes her and we’ve seen the sort of people Obama likes, but I don’t care that much.
This candidate will make stupid, baffling decisions because Obama likes it. Ho hum.
I think he should have gone fullbore and nominated someone just to tick me off. Like Frank J. Or a House Sparrow. A House Sparrow could write some interesting opinions regarding the justification for senseless killing of Tree Swallows and Bluebirds found in the Commerce Clause.
She was nominated by Obama. That’s enough reason to be opposed to her.
Is it just me, or does she look like Lou Costello in drag?
http://tinyurl.com/28svahg
http://tinyurl.com/3xh8ma
Madcap comedy ensues.
She will be a wise Jewina.
She’s only 50 years old, so we’ll be stuck with her at least 35 years. I would rather he pick some ultra liberal that’s only going to live another 3 years.
So that one denies she is homosexual, which makes her homosexual by default. Cause we all know that whatever that one says is a lie. He purposely nominated her because she is holder light, and has never publically admitted moa was her favorite person next to marx. Also because she is homeosexual, she will distract the first sasquatch long enough for that one to get back his mom jeans.
Harriet Miers.
Does she have a birth certificate? And who ever heard of anyone named Kagan? What kind of a name is that? If you spell it backwards it’s Nagak (but you won’t hear that from the MSM.)
She has confessed to getting really drunk when Reagan beat Carter. A drunk New York lesbian liberal who never served as a judge but did work fo GoldmanSachs. What could possibly go wrong with that?
Isn’t she Janet Napolitano’s ugly cousin?
Best comments I read:
-Kickback for covering up Obamas’ Harvard papers. (She was already caught whitewashing two others records)
-Blocked military from recruiting at Harvard during a time of war after 9/11 because of her disagreement over don’t ask don’t tell. (this says volumes)
-Her views on gays and marriage are more extreme then even most kos kids/move on poo flingers.
-Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid each and all filibustered and blocked all Bush picks.
Well, it makes sense. We have a president that was 47 when elected, and had never had an actual job in his life. So, why wouldn’t he nominate a “judge” to the Supreme Court who’s never been a judge?
All the liberal pukes whine about everything being ‘run by old white men’….so the solution is to give it to really really ugly white women? How does that solve anything?
She wrote her thesis on SOCIALISM in NY… what a shock. For someone who the mindless crowd insists isn’t a
socialistcommunist, he sure does hang around with a lot of people who are.Has Sarah Palin endorsed her yet?
I have a degree in History, 33 years experience in the Mommy Track and I think I should be the next technology czar. I use a computer, phone, copier and TV on a daily basis. I think I’d be a wonderful tech czar. Pick me, pick me. Of course I don’t love socialism and liberal nonsense but that could be a plus. I’d bring a whole new perspective to technological stuff and I have at least as much experience as O’vomits latest inexperienced, incompetent, sycophant.
Seanmahair for Tech Czar. Hoo Rah.
As bad as she is at least she is the lesser of several far worse evils that could have been foisted on the country by this president..
#10:
Close…
Rumor has it Ellen Kagan and Janet Napolitano are actually brothers separated at birth.
3. Burmashave ,
Lou Costello is a good call, but I think she look sa lot like this guy.
I think she looks more like British comedian David Mitchell.
I was thinking along the line of “Paul Blart Capitol Mall Cop”
The funny thing is she has loads of legal experience, knows the law and is among 40% of past supreme court judges who had never been judges. Head of Harvard law, already served with 2 administrations….seems like a wise, careful choice
To EnemyoftheState:
Kagan is a very popular Jewish lastname and millions of people heard this lastname before. I don’t know where you are from but since you have access to internet it’s very easy to find out. You should critisize or attack her point of view or her character but not her last name.
@Lika: What, you can’t take a joke? People here rip on my name (because there is also an herb spelled the same as my name, though not pronounced the same). The spelling-backwards nonsense should have been a clue.
Anyway, many of the conservatives here know of Robert Kagan, who, in my mind, would the a Kagan that is actually qualified for the Supreme Court. Frederick Kagan, too. Neither of the Kagan brothers are lawyers, but Ellen ain’t neither. But at least the Kagan brothers have some sense.