[High Praise! to Irritable Pundit]
Here’s the actual the picture on the card. Yeah, it really is a painting of a dog in snow wearing a scarf.
Because what could possibly be more Christmas-y than your dog dressed like a hipster douchebag?
[High Praise! to Irritable Pundit]
Here’s the actual the picture on the card. Yeah, it really is a painting of a dog in snow wearing a scarf.
Because what could possibly be more Christmas-y than your dog dressed like a hipster douchebag?
Bo sh*ts on the lawn…BO sh*ts on the country. What’s the problem?
Let’s treat the U.S. taxpayer like Obama treats dogs. . . . Mmmm, do-o-o-og. (Does Obama eat his dog with any kind of barbecue sauce, or does well-cooked dog taste good on its own?)
Okay, so we know that the
royaler, presidential dog groomer gets a six figure salary. So, what do we suppose is the cost to taxpayers for this painting of BO the royal pooch (and future royal lunch)?? I am guessing six figures as well to the royal artist. Color me incomprehensibly, sputteringly pissed at the waste of resources.The point is NOT to be Christmas-y, or Hanukkah-y, or any denomination-y at all. It’s all-inclusive. It’s diverse. Have a nice winter season, everybody in the Northern hemisphere!.
And I’m with T-Rich – this little exercise in proving that Bo hasn’t been eaten yet is costing us a mint.