Proposed star arrangements in case we get more state. According to this designer, 62 has aesthetic issues:
If anyone knows of a better-looking 62 star design, drop a link in the comments.
[source]
Proposed star arrangements in case we get more state. According to this designer, 62 has aesthetic issues:
If anyone knows of a better-looking 62 star design, drop a link in the comments.
[source]
Except for Newfoundland. They talk like Newfies.
Just a big digital 62. Then we can just roll up the number as we conquer more lands. Mwah!
For 62, you could use eleven stars in the top and bottom rows and. ten in each of the four middle rows.
I prefer the Earthican Flag.
I have always advocated that we should just go ahead and invade both Canada and Mexico and just take them both. With Canada we get all those yummy resources and with Mexico it will solve our immigration problem because they will already be here. Both countries have a lot of oil so that is bonus points.
Isn’t 57 enough??
I like ***************************************************************, but you must hang it high or it will drag on the ground.
For 51 I prefer a return to a more classic design. Three concentric rings of stars; 13, 17, 21.
@4 – Awesometific American – We tried annexing Mexico in 1848. Only got half of it. But the half we got is doing a far sight better than the half we didn’t.
For 62 we could just use two copies of O’Bama’s IQ test results….
@Harvey – that’s because we took the half with all the paved roads.
DC
No. you took the half which was closer to Canada.
Cheers
Looks like a cookie sheet spacing problem. Who could we get who is an expert in baking cookies?
If we add more states we have to stop at 53. It’s a prime number. One nation Indivisible!
Take the 66 design, and take out the middle two stars on the far left and far right columns to make it look like an ‘I’ or hourglass design.