A New York Times editorial advocated for a new law allowing a secret court to take away citizens’ right to own a gun at the discretion of the federal government.
So… is this something new, or just another piece advocating confirming Obama’s SCOTUS nominee?
How about. “A New York Times editorial advocated for a new law allowing a secret court to take away a citizens’ right to speak freely at the discretion of the federal government.”
or,” A New York Times editorial advocated for a new law allowing a secret court to take away a citizens’ right to marry who they want at the discretion of the federal government.”
and one for Hillary and her minions, “A New York Times editorial advocated for a new law allowing a secret court to take away a citizens’ right to plead protection against self incrimination at the discretion of the federal government.”
Sooner or later the Constitution is just going to be some paper under glass in the back of some museum, and it will be the Democrats that will put it there.
Thank God they didn’t advocate a double secret court or we’d all be in trouble.
Aren’t these the people who are always claiming republicans are Nazis?
They also hacked into this site and changed the link so we wouldn’t be able to read their fascist fantasies.
we have the second amendment because protoenvironmentalists in England instituted gun control in England to protect wildlife from over hunting.
Yes, the landed gentry were exempt, because liberals never change.