The Archbishop of Iraq has been kidnapped. In one simple move the terrorists have now pissed off one billion Catholics (well, I was already pissed-off at them). Yeah, good going.
Do these people even have a strategy? Or does their language lack a word for that?
Guess this is yet another job for prayers and Special Forces.
Maybe their strategy is that they want us to think they’re complete strategic retards. It’s like when they sent a suicide bomber against an unguarded inanimate object (the Jewish cemetary) in Tunisia; the stupidity makes our heads spin around.
Catholics versus Muslims…
Can we please put Ted Kennedy on the front lines?
When we find zarqawi I hope we don’t waste time arresting him.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Where is Torquemada(sp?) when you need him?
Well, this plays right into OBL’s vision. A new Crusade where the Caliphate will be victorious. They want a rematch against the Christians.
Hey, I’m all for a rematch on the Crusades.
I can’t wait for Ted “when-I-returned-Mary-Jo-and-the-car-were-gone” Kennedy and John “I-served-in-Vietnam-before-I-betrayed-my-country-to-them” Kerry to come out with a statement. No matter what they spew, it will piss off either their base (LLL’s) or practising Catholics.
bwah ha ha
Don’t hold your breath waiting for that statement……
crickets chirp
sweetie, go see the new pics of the kitties on my blog. 🙂
Well, as the Catholic Church actually was responsible for the Crusades, this is the first demonstration of clear thinking on the part of the terrorists I’ve seen… ever. On the other hand, it could just be a coincidence.
So the Catholic Church is responsible for the Crusades? As I recall, no one invited the Muslims into the Holy Land at that time.
Weren’t there like 3 different Crusades?
So are they trying for best out of 7?
Anty
George is in need of a history enema. Remember those pilgrims going to the holy land, much like people on airplanes- That’s who the crusade’s were protecting.
If they(muslims) didn’t massacre the defenseless, there wouldn’t have been a need to kill them. You grasping the concept, now that you’ve had a taste of it in your lifetime George? Now, there. Go shit that out before you get impacted.
Best out of seven- priceless.
“No, really, guys, the first three times we brought our B game. We got our A game now. You guys want a rematch, or are ya chicken?”
There were actually 16 crusades. First, Peoples, German, Second, Third, Fourth, Albiqensian, Children’s, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Shepherd’s, Eigth, Ninth and finally….The Northern Crusades.
So that would make this what?
Best 17 out of 33?
DixieDarlin’: Arresting joooos I guess. We’re talking of Tomás here, he was probably already on the f-fighters side before this tiny joke.
Next, they invite Castro and Billy Graham and the Dahli Lama and Vishnu’s current incarnation to Iraq and behead them. Either that, or they kidnap Glenn Reynolds and force him to reveal the secrets of puppy blending, so that they can piss everyone off.
You’re all familiar with the phrase “jump the shark” of course. I think we need a different phrase for people who have done something so stupid they’ve eliminated any credibility from their campaign. How about “Ripped the Pope”? Referring, of course, to Sinead O’Conner on Saturday Night Live, years ago.
The Title “My New Kitten Acts with More Purpose” has exactly what to do with a kidnapping?
I’m sure it’s there and I just can’t see it.
Still looking for the connection.
Hmmm. Ok, figured it out.
“Ripped the Pope”… excellent, greg.
First thing that came to my mind was “Sat in the tank” (Michael Dukakis reference).
How about taping jimmy carter to teddy before sending him out there. Two submarine screendoors for the price of one
Aw, that’s it. THIS Catholic is now officially beyond pissed. I’m gonna get the whole University of Dallas student body out there. Soldier for Christ, get your sword…
I know my history. The Church wasn’t exactly full of saints in that particular historical period.
That aside, it’s clear the Islamofascists have a screw loose. If they actually are pissed about the Crusades, and want a rematch in the war of religions, they should check their history and see who they were fighting the last time. Instead, they’ve gone totally off target and have focused their attack on the USA, an entity with no historical connection to the Crusades at all. Therefore, despite their throwing around of the word ‘crusaders’, it is clear that they don’t know what they’re talking about, and they are so full of hate that they can’t even keep a grudge straight in their heads.
Speaking of strategies, how come no liberal democrats are ever concerned that terrorists like OBL and Zarqawi (and for that matter, Saddam) don’t appear to have an “exit strategy?”