Loren S. of Brod, Czech Republic asks:
Do you think that the success of capitalism over communism has been our ability to get both “new” and “improved” in the same laundry detergent? If so, how long before the ChiComs catch on?
The ability for a detergent to be both “new” and “improved” means nothing in our superior capitalistic society, but it seems paradoxical to the foolish Communists. Detergents and their labeling are a mystery to those lacking a capitalistic orthodoxy, and it shall take the ChiComs some time to figure it out… if ever. And it will be yet another distraction to keep them from working on their neutrons bombs. I say that makes our relation with China both “new” and “improved.”
Dick of Samarinda, Indonesia asks:
Does Mars really need women?
No Melbourne, Florida does. Specifically, women in their early twenties. Not that I’m desperate or anything, but does anyone know someone around this area to set me up with. Just asking…
Richard R. of Moabi, Gabon asks:
Since the scientific method is based on experimentation, and you can’t do
any experiments on stars, is astronomy a science?
Great questions. Yes, it is true, astronomers are full of crap. “Ooh, by this light spectrum I know the composition of that distant star.” Yeah, whatever! Prove it! They can blabber on about anything, because everything they talk about would take millions of years to reach. You’ll probably see astronomers lobbying against further space exploration because they don’t want to be exposed as the frauds they are.
Astronomy won’t be an actual science until we have built a Death Star and can cruise around the galaxy blowing up planets and stars, i.e., actual experimentation. We can also then enslave alien races which will help astronomy somehow too, I believe. Oh, and I get first dibs on a Star Destroyer.

Please keep the questions coming, <a href=”mailto:THISISSPAMTHISISSPAMace you’re from, I’ll randomly select one.