When I eventually redo my About Me page again, I want to make clear that the one of the main goals is that everyone leaves this webpage happy… except for Commies and hippies. Apparently, I have not been meeting that goal.
First off, the spat between me and Bill Whittle is a joke. In yesterday’s Links of the Day when I made fun of Bill and told people to say how much you hate him, I was just kidding. Apparently, someone who will remain nameless (cough… joey d… cough…) did not seem to understand this and made nasty enough comments as to cause Bill to close down his comments section again. I consider Bill Whittle to be the best writer in the blogosphere, and, even though I don’t ultimately control my readers, I feel like a complete jerk for even being involved with this. I think it would be nice for the commenter involved to e-mail the injured party and apologize.
Had some interesting comments in my first ever Frank Answers post. One’s a funny parody of a Bill Whittle essay by apotheosis, and the other is one (or a couple) accusing me of blasphemy. Just to be clear, I am a Catholic, and, as I think I made it obvious in my Easter post, I believe Jesus kicks serious ass. At the same time, by creating humanity, I think the Lord opened himself up to satire. Religion goes against logic much of the time, and I can’t help but poke fun even as I have faith. That said, there certainly is a line than can be crossed were parody does become blasphemy. I think I was closest to that line when I had Jesus use a swear word, but, dammit, the phrase “mind-f**k” was just too apropos for the situation. Anyway, I think Jesus would find my post funny, as I was kidding Him just as I would kid other people I respect and admire. Also, I can’t imagine the Supreme Being lacking a sense of humor (I think quantum physics is His version of a practical joke). I would like the opinion of other Christians, though, of whether I did go too far (and, for those who may be confused, Catholics are Christians too).
For everyone else, I would point you to this nice essay by Steven den Beste on atheists. Before I became involved with the blogosphere, I had the opinion that all atheists were a bunch of hyper idiots with chips on their shoulders, but I luckily found that is not always true (it’s just those are the most vocal ones). The Raving Atheist seems to be one of those ‘vocal’ ones, so much so that I wonder if it’s all just a shtick. Usually, I don’t let myself get provoked (I’m less funny that way), but his manifesto “proving” there is no God was so idiotic that a while ago I posted to his message board a “proof” that the Objectivist principle of “A is A” is wrong:
Here is why “A is A” doesn’t make much sense:
They’re two f**king different A’s!!! How the hell could they be each other! One is the A on the right and one is tha A on the left! If they were each other, then how could I say, “That is that ‘A’ and that is the other ‘A'”? What kind of crack must Objectivists be smoking to think that “A is A”? If that’s one of their tenets, then I wouldn’t be surprised if another one is to wear your hat on your feet and your pants on your head.
And now I have disproved “A is A” about as much as you disproved there is a God (I’m refering to your “Basic Assumptions”). It’s an entertaining method, but I hope you don’t take it seriously.
Just thought I’d share.
I might as well add some links of the day while I’m at it. Silent Running is now a TV show. They already got an instalanche for their move (I didn’t when I moved), but I said I would link to them today, and I don’t want anyone to call Frank a liar (except when I make a post clearly labeled “Filthy Lies”).
Also, the man is trying to take On the Fritz down for their mocking of poor, senseless defenseless celebrities.
Finally, Rachel Lucas finds the funniest thing ever.
Tomorrow, a new interview with the biggest name yet and more Frank Answers.
