Can Never Have Too Many of These

The National Science Foundation is granting almost $300,000 in taxpayer funds for a “diversity research” study to make engineering classes more “LGBTQ-affirming”.

Why? In case they have to design a gazebo for a gay wedding?

12 Comments

  1. Engineering students know there’s no point in being more “LGBTQ-affirming”. Have you seen engineering students? They know they ain’t gettin’ any no matter how many genders they try cozying up to.

  2. Don’t be ridiculous. They’ll find an orthodox Christian carpenter and either humiliate him by forcing him to make the gazebo or financially wreck his life when he would rather not participate.

  3. Is there any possible way to convince Congress that these national science boards have too much money to dole out?

    NIH Spends $597,759 to Study Health Disparities Among LGBT Older Adults
    Cybercast News Service | July 17, 2015 | Melanie Hunter

    The National Institute of Aging, an agency within the National Institutes of Health, has awarded $597,759 in taxpayer funding to the University of Washington to study LGBT aging and health. The study, titled “Older Adults in Vulnerable Communities: Health and Quality of Life over Time,” will examine “the determinants of health impacting LGB older adults to assess change in health and quality of life (QOL) over time.”

    Feds Spend $222,172 Studying How Men Look at Women When They Drink
    Free Beacon | July 27, 2015 | Elizabeth Harrington

    National Institutes of Health (NIH) is spending over $200,000 to study how men drinking alcohol look at women. In an effort to limit “male-initiated sexual aggression toward female acquaintances,” researchers at the University of Iowa will analyze the actual eye movements of young men when they are drunk and sober. “While their eye movements are monitored, participants will view 200 unique scenes that depict a woman who varies along sexual interest, provocativeness-of-dress, and attractiveness dimensions in a background context that varies in sexual relevance,” according to a grant for the project.

  4. First off, they carefully remove all reference to ‘male’ and ‘female’ sockets and connecter pins, after all, that’s not transgender friendly. Also, male pins connect to female sockets, so that’s obviously homophobic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.