Nationwide, editorial boards agree that Senate leaders should get to work and hold a fair hearing for Judge Garland.
@BarackObama
“Surprisingly, not many saying that about Hillary’s FBI hearing.”
Nationwide, editorial boards agree that Senate leaders should get to work and hold a fair hearing for Judge Garland.
@BarackObama
“Surprisingly, not many saying that about Hillary’s FBI hearing.”
Sounds like editorial boards are teh ghey. But who am I to judge Judy Garland fans and what they want to be hearing.
Well, the editorial boards are our betters, so we should certainly listen to them. After all, they’re the ones who broke the story of Monica Lewinsky’s blue dress. Oh, wait, that was Matt Drudge. Well, they’re the ones who told us about John Edwards’s cheating on his wife. Oh, wait, that was the National Enquirer, whose editorial board, if it has one, is probably not among those calling for a “fair hearing” for Judge Garland. And, of course, let’s not forget the editorial board of the New York Times, who bravely stood by Jayson Blair in his unceasing quest for truth. Oh, wait, he made those stories up.
At times, I think that periodicals subject their applicants to CT and MRI scans of their brains to detect damage, and then hires the applicants whose scans indicate damage.
I hear it is something like 97% of Editorial Boards are making this claim so there is your Constitutional Authority hoss.
(throws flag)
“We have a bandwagon fallacy on the last play; just because a bunch of people agree doesn’t meant they aren’t all wrong;15 yard penalty, still 4th down.”