
[source]
Spread it around:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
- More
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)

Top 10 reasons why Melania is unqualified to regulate what school children eat:
10. She’s not black enough.
9. Trump is not our President.
8. She’s not American born.
7. She is less than 1/32 Cherokee.
6. Her hair is straight,
5. Her cheek bones appear to be chiseled.
4. She eats too much Buef which causes climate change.
3. She’s already height-weight proportional.
2. She has no experience growing arugula.
And the number one reason Melania is unqualified to regulate what school children eat:
1. She’s married to a Donald Duck.
On the other hand, could Melania be any more wrong than government nutrition nannies have been for generations?
Probably not, DamnCat. But no one can cook better chicken tetrazzini than the those sweet, old, overweight lunchroom ladies when I was in 6th grade. That was like back in 1928 – before government regulations.
They were church ladies, no doubt. No one knows how to make casseroles like chicken tetrazzinni better than church ladies.
Her qualifications are cherce.