I’ve always put that incident in the “so what” category along with these: Bill Clinton was impeached…so what! Eric Holder was found in contempt of congress…so what! Lois Learner and other IRS employees were caught holding up requests from conservatives…so what, no one of consequence got punished! Hillary Clinton was caught mishandling classified info…so what! The Ambassador to Libya was killed along with other Americans and the facts were lied about at the highest levels of government…so what, no one of consequence got punished! I could list a lot more than these but why belabor the point when the results are always the same…so what!
Will undocumented assault rifles be safe from confiscation in gun sanctuary cities?
Remember, “no gun is illegal.”
This country was built on guns. Illegal guns are just as productive as legal guns.
If Arizona tries to pass a gun ban that has the exact wording as the federal gun ban, why, we’ll boycott Arizona, sue it in court, and get it overturned by the federal courts.
If you can get a bullet into the country, it should not be separated from the gun it belongs to.
Requiring photo IDs for the purchase of guns is, of course, racist somehow.
And furthermore, a person who has an undocumented gun has not committed any crime. [/LiberalLogic]
If you can get a bullet into the country, it should not be separated from the gun it belongs to.
So you can’t actually fire a gun then?
I have a thought experiment. Let us let the Liberals prove gun confiscation works. Let us say they pick a city, Chicago for instance, and let them place on its borders any process, restrictions or physical impediments to bringing guns into the city. Then they have one year to confiscate all the guns in the city. They then must go an entire year without one non-governmental use [By Police] of a firearm. No exceptions to this, NO GUNS MEANS NO GUNS. I don’t care how much Oprah’s security detail may want to pack they must surrender their firearms before entering the city. IF they can go one year without ONE incident, or finding one illegal gun I might consider doing it for the entire country. Maybe.
My guess is gun crime would not only not decrease, but would certainly increase.
Are there contraband restrictions in prisons? Do they work effectively> In PRISONS, where we should have total control over drugs, shivs, whatever…
Year 1: No guns allowed into the test zone.
Year 2: Confiscation attempted. Laughed at. Prohibition on gangsteroids.
Year 3: Laughing criminals laugh all the way to the bank. And the liquor store. And the supermarket. And the drugstore. And rival gang street corners. And the foolish, foolish liberal rich folks’ houses.
Which would prove the point that getting rid of legal firearms is not the answer. But you know the paraphrase, “You can always tell a Liberal, but they just won’t listen to you.”
Might be worth a try, although it didn’t work when Obama had them send guns to Mexico so they could be brought back and used to murder Border Agents.
I’ve always put that incident in the “so what” category along with these: Bill Clinton was impeached…so what! Eric Holder was found in contempt of congress…so what! Lois Learner and other IRS employees were caught holding up requests from conservatives…so what, no one of consequence got punished! Hillary Clinton was caught mishandling classified info…so what! The Ambassador to Libya was killed along with other Americans and the facts were lied about at the highest levels of government…so what, no one of consequence got punished! I could list a lot more than these but why belabor the point when the results are always the same…so what!
Will undocumented assault rifles be safe from confiscation in gun sanctuary cities?
Remember, “no gun is illegal.”
This country was built on guns. Illegal guns are just as productive as legal guns.
If Arizona tries to pass a gun ban that has the exact wording as the federal gun ban, why, we’ll boycott Arizona, sue it in court, and get it overturned by the federal courts.
If you can get a bullet into the country, it should not be separated from the gun it belongs to.
Requiring photo IDs for the purchase of guns is, of course, racist somehow.
And furthermore, a person who has an undocumented gun has not committed any crime. [/LiberalLogic]
If you can get a bullet into the country, it should not be separated from the gun it belongs to.
So you can’t actually fire a gun then?
I have a thought experiment. Let us let the Liberals prove gun confiscation works. Let us say they pick a city, Chicago for instance, and let them place on its borders any process, restrictions or physical impediments to bringing guns into the city. Then they have one year to confiscate all the guns in the city. They then must go an entire year without one non-governmental use [By Police] of a firearm. No exceptions to this, NO GUNS MEANS NO GUNS. I don’t care how much Oprah’s security detail may want to pack they must surrender their firearms before entering the city. IF they can go one year without ONE incident, or finding one illegal gun I might consider doing it for the entire country. Maybe.
My guess is gun crime would not only not decrease, but would certainly increase.
Are there contraband restrictions in prisons? Do they work effectively> In PRISONS, where we should have total control over drugs, shivs, whatever…
Year 1: No guns allowed into the test zone.
Year 2: Confiscation attempted. Laughed at. Prohibition on gangsteroids.
Year 3: Laughing criminals laugh all the way to the bank. And the liquor store. And the supermarket. And the drugstore. And rival gang street corners. And the foolish, foolish liberal rich folks’ houses.
It’d be freakin’ Hollowpointween.
Which would prove the point that getting rid of legal firearms is not the answer. But you know the paraphrase, “You can always tell a Liberal, but they just won’t listen to you.”
Good question but the wall will stop nuts, felons, terrorists, illegal aliens AND all their contraband. No negatives.