Swiped Off the Internet: EVs

Some guy on a news forum:

They’ve been looking for a much more ENERGY DENSE battery. There are at least four major conceptual problems with EVs:

1. Energy density — a 700-lb 70 kWh EV battery holds about the same energy as 2 gallons of gas (14 lb).

2. Charging time — pumping 70 kWh into an EV battery takes a long time — dependent, of course, on the available power of the charger and grid. No amount of tinkering with battery chemistry will overcome this problem.

3. Power availability — where does this power come from? The eco nut jobs insist on wind and solar. These are not only intermittent and unreliable. They are extremely capital intensive for the low amount of power generated per dollar spent. The transportation sector of the US economy uses the equivalent power of all of the nuclear plants in the USA combined. Wind and solar cannot match this.

4. COST — EV batteries are extremely expensive and have a relatively short life. Once the virtue signaling morons have all bought theirs, normal car buyers are not interested in buying an expensive impractical vehicle that has a depreciation curve like a rock dropped off a cliff.

There are numerous other issues that the fan boys/ shills try to lie away, but these alone should be enough to turn any sensible buyer away.

From elsewhere in the thread:

“Einstein:
Everything Should Be Made as Simple as Possible, But Not Simpler”

Uh-Oh. Avoid Grassy Knolls, Moon Nukers, and Starting Your Own Vehicle

Biden-Harris Regime Quietly Amends Directive Against Assassination of Americans
Headline USA | 10/07/2024 | Luis Cornelio

The Biden-Harris administration amended a Bush-era directive against the assassination of Americans as it pertains to law enforcement activities in intelligence collection and national security.

The Defense Department appears to have removed language asserting that “under no circumstances shall any” component or employee of the federal body “engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination.”

This clear language appeared in the August 2007 version of the directive, which relates to the implementation of former President Ronald Reagan’s Executive Order 12333, originally signed in 1981.

On Sept. 27, 2024, the Defense Department established more vague language, stating that no department “civilian employee or member of the Armed Forces will engage in, or conspire to engage in assassination.”

The “under no circumstances” clause is notably missing, prompting many on social media to sound the alarm about the intent behind the change.

ASSASSIN@TION: Last month the Biden-Harris regime updated the 2007 DoD Directive 5240.01 removing the prohibition, “Under no circumstances shall any DoD Component or DoD employee

[… leaves a whole lot of wiggle room, doesn’t it? What about an IRS asset? — Oppo ]

… engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassin@tion.” Under the regime’s new rules the government can target foreign nationals and Americans both here and abroad.

h/t @nataliegwinters

pic.twitter.com/lO0XwPCWjP

— @amuse (@amuse) October 5, 2024

The amendment was first noted by journalist Ken Klippenstein’s page, KlipNews, which shared the news on X.

Natalie Winters, a journalist and co-host of Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast, also highlighted the change on X.

“Odd thing to change. Especially stripping the ‘under no circumstances’” …