(AP) Following the Motion Picture Association of America’s recent decision to take a more negative view of tobacco use in movies, the MPAA today announced that depictions of practicing Islam will also come under greater scrutiny. However, some critics said the move does not go far enough to discourage teens from taking up the degenerate religion.
MPAA Chairman Dan Glickman said his group’s ratings board, which previously had considered kids wearing bomb belts in assigning film ratings, now will take into account Koran-waving and other Muslim kookiness by adults, as well.
That adds Islamic rituals to a list of such factors as sex, violence and language in determining the MPAA’s G, PG, PG-13, R and NC-17 ratings.
Film raters will consider the pervasiveness of jihadist propaganda, whether it glamorizes terrorism, and the context in which the Islamic behavior appears, as in movies set before 9/11, when Islam was marginally less despicable.
Some critics of Hollywood’s depictions of Muslim insanity in films have urged that movies that show any aspect of Islam be assigned an R rating, which would restrict those younger than 17 from seeing them.
“I’m glad it’s finally an issue they’re taking up, but what they’re proposing does not go far enough and is not going to make a difference,” said Tori Titus, spokeswoman for Americans Against Dhimmitude, which opposes film images of Islam that might encourage young people to start worshipping a psychotic, bloodthirsty, Mood-God.
Glickman disagreed, saying a mandatory R rating for Islam would not “further the specific goal of providing information to parents on this issue.”
“Although,” he added, “it might be nice to discourage film-makers from actively kissing the enemy’s ass.”
Islam in movies with a G, PG or PG-13 rating has been on the decline, and the “percentage of films that included even a fleeting glimpse of Imam-approved methods of slaughtering innocents declined from 60 percent to 52 percent between July 2004 and July 2006,” Glickman said.
Of those films, “three-fourths received an R rating for other reasons”, he said, “since it’s almost impossible to depict a Muslim without also showing him happily murdering children in Allah’s name.”
“That means there’s not a great amount of films in the unrestricted category as it stands,” said Joan Graves, who heads the ratings board. “We’re not saying we’re ignoring the issue. We’re trying the best way possible according to what we’ve learned from parents to give them information about what’s in a film.”
“In short,” she summarized, “if it contains Islam, it’s boring, stupid, and evil. Don’t waste your money.”
Descriptions on sex, violence and language that accompany movie ratings now will include such phrases as “glamorized Islam” or “filthy, murdering terrorists robotically obeying their pedophile prophet,” Glickman said.
If rated today, a film such as 2005’s “V for Vendetta,” which features a homosexual fawning over a Koran, would have carried a “politically correct pandering to Muslims” tag but probably would have retained its PG rating because it takes place in an idyllic future where Islam has been wiped from the face of the earth, Graves said.
Titus said film raters should be as tough on Islam as they are on bad language to minimize the effects of on-screen Koran-babble on children, including her own 5-year-old daughter.
“I don’t want her using bad language, but last time I checked, she’s probably not going to die from that,” Titus said. “If Islam becomes acceptable because of these images she sees in movies, chances are she’s probably going to die early from that. Mostly likely from being stoned to death in a soccer stadium for not wearing a burka.”
While Titus’ group wants tougher ratings restrictions, the MPAA is not without its supporters.
“By placing this sick, twisted, maladaptive ‘religion’ on a par with considerations of violence and sex, the rating board has acknowledged the public-health dangers to children associated with glamorized images of a toxic and lethal belief in Islam,” Barry Bloom, dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, said in a statement.

To further promote policy, are theaters going to start giving free pork rinds?
They could use some sort of pork-derived product to buff the floors. That would be awesome.
//”By placing this sick, twisted, maladaptive ‘religion’ on a par with considerations of violence and sex, the rating board has acknowledged the public-health dangers to children associated with glamorized images of a toxic and lethal belief in Islam,” Barry Bloom, dean of the Harvard School of Public Health, said in a statement.//
WOW! that came out of a school employee??? Freaking-A! yeah, I realize Harvard isn’t your typical politically correct sycophant but it’s still interesting to hear.
//”Although,” he added, “it might be nice to discourage film-makers from actively kissing the enemy’s ass.”//
LOL! That’s friggin’ hilarious, Fra…I mean, Harvey. Will this rating policy affect Moore’s “factual” documentaries?
Excellent. You guys rock. I’ve got to figure out a way to work in that line about a “homosexual fawning over a Koran” into a story.
Damn. That is funny.
Too funny. Thanks, I needed the diversion.
So, take for instance the proverbial “Hassan Head Chop;” – the rating is dependent upon the age of the aggressor/character? Age 13 and below, – Rated G; age 14 on up, – Rated PG-13?
Would wanton molestation, such as “goat buggering,” warrant an NC-17 rating from the Muslim Picture Association of Allah?
…very complex issues, these are.