The health care “debate” is giving us a good idea of how Democrats debate when they’re in power. Anyway, here is their whole debate cycle so you know when we’re reaching the end:
DEMOCRAT DEBATE CYCLE
* Call you a racist.
* Have you beaten by union thugs.
* Call you un-American.
* Scream at you how much smarter they are.
* Call you a racist again.
* Threaten to put you into a reeducation camp.
* Unintelligible gibberish.
* Curl into a ball and whimper.
How could you forget references to Nazis? That is the heart of any failed argument.
Tommy, that may be part of the unintelligible gibberish.
If it was up to me, the debate would be about getting the government out of health care entirely.
We cant afford medicare and medicaid, as it is, let alone in a few years as the boomers start retiring.
The needy and old would be better off if we left them in the care of private charity and their families. The not so needy would be able to be more charitable as they would be paying less taxes, and getting a better deal on their healthcare.
Any time you involve the government in something they make it inefficient and expensive and a vehicle to abuse power. The only thing they do well is war.
The Democrat Debate Cycle, sort of like the instructions on the shampoo bottle. Attack, Lather, Repeat
Add to the cycle – “A consensus of scientists/economists/experts agree” – without actually being able to name any of them
You left out:
* Ask others to snitch on you for exposing the truth.
Democratic Debate Cycle
I think it’s like my old Triumph. The electrical system sucks and it leaks oil even when there is none.
You forgot try to convince everyone that history never happened and that their cause isn’t an utter failure.
Oh! and oh yeah.
Racist!
There’s a debate cycle? I thought a democrack opened it’s mouth says something and then you punch it and that was the end of the debate.
You say you are going to raise taxes on evil rich people.
Then you raise taxes on everyone, because we all live in an evil rich country which makes us ALL evil rich people.
PENALTY, Frank J. 15 yards for using oxymorons.
Updated Democrat Debate Cycle: FLUFF >> SPIN >> SOIL >> (AD HOMINEM)ATTACKS >> (PHYSICAL)ATTACKS >> DENIAL >> REDIRECT/BLAME >> LATHER(INTO A FRENZY) >> RINSE( OF ANY RESPONSIBILITY ) >> REPEAT( UNTIL INDUSTRIAL MEDIA COMPLEX REPEATS IT FOR YOU )
Don’t forget step one: Pretend everyone already agrees with you.
And step five: have fun mocking and mimicking all who oppose you.
* Deflect criticisms of Obama by repeating “What about Bush?”
I can’t wait until a Thomas Sowell or Larry Elder becomes the first black Republican president so we can turn off our brains, relax and defend him against every attack by saying “well, you’re just RACIST!” Just like liberals. Liberals brains must be very fresh when they reach old age, having been utilized so little.
They had gotten away from the whole union thug thing for anyone not opposing unionization.
But I figure, they’re practicing for the card check uptick in union thuggism.
Goons, hired goons, need practice too.
* Don’t answer the phone
* Only debate people who agree with you or are too stupid to realize you are lying.
* Only talk directly to the MSM (see above bullet)
The Democrat debate cycle needs training wheels.
* Unintelligible gibberish.
I thought that was every word from liberals mouth.
We left out the sobbing mommys (male and female) on Oprahkotheview20/20today crying that without this new whatever-it-is wonder bill the children will DIE a terrible and horrible painful death.
How about that smiling beaver Hoyner????? Holy fornicating hoptoads!! That guy looks like he could fell a grove of trees and build his little Dem dam with those shocking toofers of his faster than any non-union family of beavers!!
Thufferin’ thuckotash Hoyner!!! Get some friggin’ braces…or at least a decent set of veneers!! Fer crissakes! Ya can’t go out in public like that!
Jeeze!
You missed the step where they attack Sarah Palin. If I recall the sequence, this one sort of pops up randomly, so I can see how you overlooked it.
Democrats debate? Ha Ha Ha that’s a good one. There can be NO debate– the Dem’s have told us how to think! So stop– resistance is futile
I think if people would pay attention to Doctor Ezekiel Emmanual the brother of Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanual, who advocates the ‘Complete Lives System’ as part of the health plan they would understand where the Euthanasia talk comes from. First I think it’s a grave conflict of interest to have the Chief of Staff’s brother advising the president on health care and second his plan, google it please, firmly advocates giving the good health care to the 15 to 50 year olds. Not the babies who might be born with a medical problem and certainly not the elderly. His contention is the elderly have lived their lives so do not need to be treated aggresively and the babies have not lived their lives so have not shown any worth yet. Please google it and read the entire thing and you will see how terribly scary this plan is.