So Obama is going to raise taxes on those making over $250,000, so there goes any suggestion that actually helping the economy might ever be more important to Obama than the brain dead liberal agenda. And what does he need more tax money for? When did whether he could afford things actually start to be important?
So when we’re hurting for jobs, we’re going to take more money away from the people who actually create jobs to go into the giant black hole that is the federal government under Obama. And some people — the whiners –won’t even care that will hurt the economy as long as the rich get hurt too. You want my strategy to stimulate the economy? We tell the whiners we accidentally dropped a Snickers bar in a cannon. And when they climb in the cannon to get the Snickers bar — BOOM! — we seal up a crate around the cannon and ship it out of the country. And here’s the thing: The Snickers bar was really in my pocket the whole time.
I bet you’re thinking, “Why don’t you just fire the whiner out of the cannon?” I looked into doing that, and it ends up there was too many regulations around the amount of gunpowder that would be involved. But think of how our economy would flourish if we could fire all the whiners out of cannons; it would make the 80s look like a recession in comparison.
Obama never pretended any different. In the Obama/Clinton debate, Charlie Gibson (of all people) pointed out to him that whenever capitatal gains taxes are increased there is a drop in federal revenue. Here is his response:
What is important is not balancing the federal budget, or providing jobs. What is important is making the world conform to Barack Obama’s ideal of fairness – no matter how many livelihoods are ruined in the process. It’s all about making everyone equally miserable (except Barack Obama ’cause that would be racist).
Can’t we just knock obama out, ship him off to zimbabwe and when he wakes up tell him that he has been in a coma for a year but his plans have finally succeeded? that way everyone could be happy.
I would say time travel and prevent Obama from rising to power, but I think there’s a natural law that says that even if he doesn’t become president, someone or something worse would happen instead.
I bet you’re thinking, “Why don’t you just fire the whiner out of the cannon?” I looked into doing that, and it ends up there was too many regulations around the amount of gunpowder that would be involved. But think of how our economy would flourish if we could fire all the whiners out of cannons; it would make the 80s look like a recession in comparison.
I have fired whiners out of cannon, and I have had no problems unless I had over 4 whiners stuffed in the cannon. I think that’s the limit. Four whiners per cannon. Also don’t use FFg powder, use Fg powder or anything more coarse. You may lose a cannon now and then, but what are you going to do? Punch a hippie in the face?
The envy and greed of the libbies have no end. I would suggets firing off rhe cannon, but comments on Pelosi’s and Mrs. Cclinton’s Flying Monkeys might be taken out of context racially.
it is known in economics that if you want less of something tax it. if you want more of something subsidize it. obama wants to tax wealth creation and subsidize joblessness and welfare. seems wrong to me.
The 250k+ broke big for Obama.. screw em. The GOP needs a working class movement. Screw the welfare leeches that have emptied the basic safety net that is supposed to be there for actual American citizens who have paid into it. Screw the rich white liberal elite they can pay more taxes until we get the budget sorted out and maybe afterward just for fun.
All those CEO who have won huge from all this deregulation and booming economy , fine so they dont want to be politicians, but do you see them chipping in a few bucks to help keep the movement afloat? Not saying Soros but those 30million dollar a year CEO either dont donate or are social liberals and toss all sorts of money that way. You see the GE and BP and JP Morgan and countrywide executives in bed with the left.
Blue collar or dirty white collar Americans who work hard 40-50 hours a week and are getting sold out from every end between china, india, and illegals need help desperately but instead all the money goes to the “dependent class” that keep gerrymandered democrats permanently in power.
A large amount of the wealthy in this country habitually vote Democrat, so if they get their taxes jacked up by Obama they are getting (as far as I’m concerned) exactly what they deserve.
What if the whiner’s a mexican? Wouldn’t you be in favor of firing the cannon then? Come on Frank, be consistent.
Frankj, you used the term “black hole”, you RAAACIST!
Tax the rich! Tax the rich!
Don’t you clowns know that it’s the rich that hire people? Maybe it takes a communist to recognize this fact. I once saw Pavel Bure asked about his $10 million contract and how it feels to be rich after playing hockey in the Soviet Union for peanuts. He said “I’m not rich. The guy that signs my check is rich”
When was the last time you heard some unemployed slob say “Drinks for the house, I just got hired by a homeless guy!”
Frank, a Railgun is what is needed! No gun powder so no regulatory nonsense! We just fire them to what ever country we want (Canada, France, Mexico, Iran) and they travel there at the speed of sound. They actually arrive before the sonic BOOM which would like be totally cool!
Why would any democrats be upset over tax increases? Only people who work pay taxes.
I love firing people out of cannons and railguns as much as the next violent right-wing terrorist, but our country is in bad financial shape.
We can’t afford to waste resources. I vote for rounding up all the slackers and welfare cheats and politicians (redundant) and sell them to the highest bidder.
China has a fast growing economy, they need more workers. North Korea needs food. Everyone wins.
Ok, Republicans.
Write up a bill that specifies EXACTLY what o says he wants and bring it to the floor for a vote.
Lower and middle stage tax rates stay the same, only the highest tax rate goes up, marriage penalties and inheritance taxes stay out, etc.
Would the Dems vote for it, would o sign it, or would they squirm out of it by some BS excuse?