The Best Way to Pass the Time Waiting for the Obamacare Decision

Having a beer at a pedal-powered mobile bar.

[Via Very Demotivational]

24 Comments

  1. Comrades it was fun living in a free country for a while, but the communists have won. All hail king doosh. This decision means that john roberts is dumber than nancy pelousy.

  2. This decision means that all you holding out on Romney had best go ahead and jump to his side, because Help Me Obi-Wan Mitt Romney; You’re our only hope!

    I’m just going to say it: I think someone got to the SC and there was some sort of blackmail.

  3. Roberts should rightfully go down in history as the man who singlehandedly took down the United States of America.

    However perhaps, finally, the unchecked powers of the Supreme Court can finally be challenged. The last thing the Founding Fathers ever envisioned was nine un-elected people holding a position of massive power for life, without a proper process of review by other branches of government. The Supreme Court was never intended to have much power over anything, and they didn’t even have their own court until 1935, as the Founding Fathers didn’t give them much power or importance. Unfortunately, the decision in Marbury v. Madison, in which Chief Justice John Marshall staged a massive power grab, announcing that “judicial review” by his own court would now be the final decision on all matters, has long needed to be challenged and revised by the other “equal” branches of government. Instead, good people have sat by as radical socialists like Ruth Bader Ginsberg have been allowed to rule over the land unchecked.

    Instead of Americans worrying about which president is going to appoint which co-dictator-for-life to the Supreme Court, the next mission of the Tea Party needs to be to pressure Congress and a Republican president to address “judicial review” and restore the courts to an equal branch of government, complete with a review process, and perhaps term limits.

  4. Harvey, may I suggest that, in light of the current state of siege which this country is under, that the flag displayed in the left column either be inverted, as a sign of distress, or that it be replaced by the Jolly Roger-for we’re all in thrall to freebooters now.

  5. There is no political humor in this. So, imo, our beloved IMAO writing team is forgiven if they can’t muster a single snarky comment about it.

    A brilliant nephew of mine just wrote:

    “Wow, the supreme court is really a bummer… I guess being an American isn’t what I thought it was. Where should we move to? The wealthy are bailing, maybe we should too. So bummed out by The Supremes…”

    I am equally bummed and shall now go cultivate my potatoes and count my ammo.

  6. Putting a small, dessicated cherry on top of this judicial excrement sundae: SCOTUS struck down the Stolen Valor Act.

    So go ahead and brag about having served, as a seven-star general, in Afghanistan, Panama, and the Phillipines, flown P-40s in China next to Claire Chennault as you polish up your thirteen Medals of Honor, five CIBs, & SEAL Budweiser. Put a gif of a Ranger tab and jumpwings on your Facebook pages, along with a jpeg of your camo-painted scowling mug.

    Yep, as that Scottish-born latenighter is fond of saying, it’s a great day for America.

  7. Harvey, it’s exactly that line of thinking that makes us so necessary. You can’t do something just because we haven’t told you not to do it You need to wait until we tell you you have to do it.

    As one of our mentors once said, “That which isn’t forbidden is mandatory.”

  8. No kidding PPACA could have been framed as a tax, but the whole point is that it wasn’t, so SCOTUS had to rewrite the law in order to make it fit their sophistry.

    Dear lord, I can’t believe Nancy Pelosi was right. It’s like I’ve entered a bizarro US.

    I’m disappointed, but there’s but two directions to go from here: give up on PPACA, or use it as a rallying cry to elect a Congress that will resurrect the Constitution by amendment. Can you imagine amending the Constitution with the text of existing amendments just to wipe out crazy precedent?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.