Note for media unfamiliar with firearms: A semi-automatic gun fires one bullet for each trigger pull. Same as a revolver.
Re: Bloomberg, can’t someone just put up a sign in city hall that says, “You must be this tall to be a fascist.”
It’s yet more evidence that our country has lost its way that Mike Bloomberg isn’t being slapped constantly.
I’m going to drink a 17oz soda while shooting stuff. Like an American.
Yep; it’s true. Once you pass 10,000 Twitter followers, your life begins to have some semblance of meaning to it.
The difference between risking your money and a politician risking other people’s money is the difference between an actual war and Call of Duty.
Stop interpreting Obama’s statement as an extreme anti-business remark when it was merely a mild anti-business remark!
It’s getting easier to see Obama as a supervillain. “You didn’t build this… but I’ll destroy it!”
Obama: “I didn’t say that. Somebody else made that be said.”
Cars kill way more people than guns, yet no effort to make cars harder to get. So why the focus on guns? Because of pants-wetting sissies.
If you’re actually concerned about people being tragically killed, guns shouldn’t be on the top of your list. If.
Anti-gun people need to ask why the obsession with guns and none of the other potentially preventable causes of tragic death. Only then can they get to the root of the irrational fear and perhaps approach the issue more logically.
Logic? That’s crazy talk, Frank! You sound like a member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
Obama: “I didn’t say that. Somebody else made that be said.”
Obama: “Dammit, who said that? God damn America! I didn’t say that! Death to our troops! Oh my God, shut up! Who, me? Whaaa!” (runs out of press room)
If you’re a car and you killed someone, you didn’t do that. Someone else made that happen.
If you’re Obama and you created or saved millions of jobs, you didn’t do that. It didn’t happen.
Press: “Can you clarify on your latest anti-business rant?”
Obama: “Let me be clear, Obama is in here, with us”.
“Cars kill way more people than guns, yet no effort to make cars harder to get.”
Because limiting car sales doesn’t help undermine The Constitution.
I don’t know that it was intended to make cars harder to get, but EPA standards rather dramatically increased the prices of cars, which, in turn, made them harder to get.
Fear of guns is much like fear of frogs. Both are completely irrational. It is pointless to apply logic and rational thought to solving an irrational fear. When my daughter “freaks out” over a frog, I simply laugh and make a demeaning comment. Liberals should be parented in much the same way.
Making more laws against guns is like making laws against cancer…it won’t stop a damn thing, and will probably just result in innocent Americans suddenly being considered criminals.
And there is a national movement to turn all local roads to 25 mph. Will it save lives? Sure. But wouldn’t reducing it to 15 save even more lives? Why not 10? Why not 5?
I don’t want to make light of families who have lost kids that got hit by cars or anything–but it’s the same impulse that drives the most well-intentioned of the gun control crowd. There are never enough restrictions; hard cases should always make the law; and no human freedom is worth one human life.
Maybe we can’t eradicate deaths from falls at home, but we can tax the hell out of gravity. – Mayor Bloomberg
Wasn’t ‘Cash for Clunkers’ supposed to put more of those dangerous cars on street? [Although technically, the street is where cars go]