Option the First makes no sense…is it the bespectacled person who draws offense (being poor at grammar either provocatively or accidentally)? Thus forcing a respondent to the second option. Or, is it a case of the scenario taking place during a discussion of the relative adiposity of the individuals resultant from an improper diet, with the one in the glasses using flashcards provided by Michele Obama?
There is an unstated third option…consume the bacon and gently lead the Other of Significance to a thorough understanding of contractions in the English language.
Jimmy, who’s to say that is a female wearing the glasses? No prominent secondary female characteristics being evident…it could be a pocket on that t-shirt.
And what the HELL is going on with that person in the green vest? No eyes or eye sockets?!? Born in Chernobyl??
So we have an androgynous person torturing someone visually impaired by way of physical defect…
Here, Hawkeye, read this card for me, and maybe I’ll let you play sniff-for-the-bacon
@2: ” Jimmy says: There is a fourth option. Simply utter the words, “You’re ugly” and walk away.”
Er…Jimmy…shouldn’t that read: and run away with the bacon! ?
Yeah, and notice that there is nothing actually, grammatically wrong with the words “your fat.” Then, maybe the correct response would be: “your face.”
Option the First makes no sense…is it the bespectacled person who draws offense (being poor at grammar either provocatively or accidentally)? Thus forcing a respondent to the second option. Or, is it a case of the scenario taking place during a discussion of the relative adiposity of the individuals resultant from an improper diet, with the one in the glasses using flashcards provided by Michele Obama?
There is an unstated third option…consume the bacon and gently lead the Other of Significance to a thorough understanding of contractions in the English language.
There is a fourth option. Simply utter the words, “You’re ugly” and walk away.
Er…Jimmy…shouldn’t that read your ugly?
Hehe. Bunker, I interpreted the cartoon to mean that she was the tester and not the testee. And she’s ugly. No offense, no bacon, no playing.
I’m a meanie.
Jimmy, who’s to say that is a female wearing the glasses? No prominent secondary female characteristics being evident…it could be a pocket on that t-shirt.
And what the HELL is going on with that person in the green vest? No eyes or eye sockets?!? Born in Chernobyl??
So we have an androgynous person torturing someone visually impaired by way of physical defect…
Here, Hawkeye, read this card for me, and maybe I’ll let you play sniff-for-the-bacon
@2: ” Jimmy says: There is a fourth option. Simply utter the words, “You’re ugly” and walk away.”
Er…Jimmy…shouldn’t that read: and run away with the bacon! ?
Yeah, and notice that there is nothing actually, grammatically wrong with the words “your fat.” Then, maybe the correct response would be: “your face.”
Tainted bacon, CT. From a female grammar Nazi wearing a T-shirt with a breast pocket! Nooooooooooo!
The proper response can only be, “What about my fat?”