11 Comments

  1. I suppose that this is usage, rather than grammar (but so is the “begs the question” thing, with which I agree), but, English, pronouns have gender (in some other languages, so do nouns), people have sex. It is absolutely incorrect to refer to somebody’s “gender”.

  2. The list would be long, but it’s hard to think of them on the spot.

    I’m glad they brought up the “begs the question” problem — it grates on my ears, but takes too long to explain to people why it’s wrong. — And one has to question whether, if everyone starts using it in the wrong way, does that become its new meaning?

    “If he would have done this” or “would have done that . . . ” — No.
    But I’m not ready to die on that hill, either.

    The Oxford comma I will forever defend. “We need sandwiches: bologna, peanut butter and jelly” — is that two kinds of sandwiches or three? If consistently used, the serial comma prevents this kind of misinterpretation.

  3. There are certain phrases that don’t make sense or sound stupid to me. Examples:

    “if you will” (Referring to a word they’ve used, if I will what?)

    “turn of phrase” (Phrases don’t ‘turn.’)

    “having said that” (Having said what, exactly? You’re right; no one’s listening to you.)

    “What goes around, comes around” (If it goes ‘around,’ how could it not come around again? This one is meant for someone with an IQ of about 70.)

    And my number one pet peeve of all time:

    “Absolutely!” (Are you sure? Absolutely! Wait…)

  4. If you say ‘pop’ instead of ‘soda’, you are somewhere between dogs and microwave ovens on the evolutionary scale.

    However, I nominate ‘The most bang for your buck!’ (Unless you are referring to a high caliber bullet to take down deer.)

    I am annoyed by the use of the term ‘genocide’ when the speaker means ‘massacre’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.