EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said that fighting climate change could save 69,000 lives by the year 2100.
Uh huh… Probably turn out like the savings from Obamacare.
8 Comments
It is amazing what kind of made up B***S*** gets believed these days. Honestly, 69,000 saved by just fighting? What if the fight fails or are the 69,000 saved only by success and what would such a success look like? Egads these people are annoying. I got one word for them all, Dunning–Kruger.
I guess she’ll be passing out 69,000 taxpayer purchased flotation devices to the rich liberal types that buy houses on the Florida coast even though they are certain it will be under water in 10 years.
Unfortunately the 69,000 lives saved by fighting global warming™ will be more than offset by the millions who will be killed when Iran nukes us off the face of the planet.
But Obama care will cause millions of ‘premature’ deaths by then, funny how they’re concerned about premature deaths when they can tax people more but when it costs taxpayers trillions, it’s ok.
I notice there’s no explanation of how they came up with this very specific..odd number, could it be they just made it up? O_O
If they wanted to save that many lives by the end of the century, they could shut down planned parenthood and meet their ‘lives saved’ quota a LOT faster…
It is amazing what kind of made up B***S*** gets believed these days. Honestly, 69,000 saved by just fighting? What if the fight fails or are the 69,000 saved only by success and what would such a success look like? Egads these people are annoying. I got one word for them all, Dunning–Kruger.
I guess she’ll be passing out 69,000 taxpayer purchased flotation devices to the rich liberal types that buy houses on the Florida coast even though they are certain it will be under water in 10 years.
And these people fight homelessness by providing homeless people with shopping carts.
Unfortunately the 69,000 lives saved by fighting global warming™ will be more than offset by the millions who will be killed when Iran nukes us off the face of the planet.
But Obama care will cause millions of ‘premature’ deaths by then, funny how they’re concerned about premature deaths when they can tax people more but when it costs taxpayers trillions, it’s ok.
I notice there’s no explanation of how they came up with this very specific..odd number, could it be they just made it up? O_O
…huh…you could probably save an order of magnitude more by spending the money wasted on global warming on cancer research
blarg, even better, spend the money on prevention and treatment of malaria. Malaria kills 584,000 to 855,000 deaths per YEAR.
If they wanted to save that many lives by the end of the century, they could shut down planned parenthood and meet their ‘lives saved’ quota a LOT faster…