2 Comments

  1. Twitter’s lame excuse was that his post “could affect the outcome of an election.”

    Well, that applies to every anti-Democrat comment anyone posts.

    (Anti-conservative ones they conveniently ignore and publish.)

  2. “Could affect the outcome of an election” is such a meaningless statement. As Oppo points out, and what anyone with a functioning brain can figure out, the whole point of public debate IS to influence an election. To change someone’s mind on how to vote. To encourage someone to vote for someone in particular. To defend a cause, promote an idea or to simply raise awareness. To ban speech which “May” influence an election is to choose a side you want and end the debate. You aren’t a “Public” platform anymore in doing that, you are a private society with membership rules. In Twitter’s case rule number 1 is “No Conservatives need apply”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.