Rock ‘n Roll Throwdown : 1950s

Good morning and the final group of 8 matches is ready to go. But first let us recap the winners from last week.

  • That’s all right Def. Lawdy Miss Clawdy 47-14
  • Ain’t that a shame Def. Lucille 48-23
  • Roll over Beethoven Def. The Great Pretender 46-30
  • Fever Def. In the still of the night 64-44
  • I only have eyes for you def. Heartbreak Hotel 42-33
  • I walk the line def. For your precious love 56-42
  • Blueberry Hill def. Money honey 54-9
  • Sh-boom def. Please, please, please 47-18

On to this week’s matches.

Match 1

Long Tall Sally – Little Richard vs Mack the Knife – Bobby Darin

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
73 votes · 73 answers

Match 2

That’ll be the day – Buddy Holly vs You send me – Sam Cooke

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
73 votes · 73 answers

Match 3

Maybellene – Chuck Berry vs Searchin’ – The Coasters

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
66 votes · 66 answers

Match 4

Bo Diddley – Bo Diddley vs All Shook Up – Elvis Presley

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
71 votes · 71 answers

Match 5

Shake, Rattle and Roll – Joe Turner vs Folsom Prison Blues – Johnny Cash

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
70 votes · 70 answers

Match 6

Blue Suede Shows – Carl Perkins vs Yakety Yak – The Coasters

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
73 votes · 73 answers

Match 7

Don’t be Cruel – Elvis Presley vs Rocket 88 – Jackie Brentson

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
67 votes · 67 answers

Match 8

Bye, Bye, Love – Everly Brothers – 60 Minute Man – Dominoes

VS

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which song do you prefer?
63 votes · 63 answers

Thursday Night Open Thread: Hmm — Counting Machines That Can’t Count? What Are the Odds?

Palm Beach Elections Overturned After Hand-Count Reveals Op-Scans Mistallied Results
Brad Blog | March 30, 2012 | Brad Friedman

The computers got it wrong. The losing candidates were declared and certified as the “winners.” But they didn’t actually receive more votes than their opponents. This time, we happened to find out.

From the Palm Beach Post:

The supplier of Palm Beach County’s voting and tabulating equipment says a software “shortcoming” led to votes being assigned to the wrong candidates and the elections office declaring the wrong winners in two recent Wellington council races. County Elections Supervisor Susan Bucher, who insisted a computer glitch rather than human error was to blame for the fiasco, claimed vindication after Dominion Voting Systems released its statement.

Wellington and 15 other municipalities held elections on March 13. In Wellington, the ballot was set up with the mayor’s race first, the Seat 1 council race second and the Seat 4 council race third.

Unbeknownst to elections officials, the vote totals for the mayor’s race ended up being reported and later certified as the results of the Seat 1 race. The Seat 1 vote totals were certified as the Seat 4 results and the Seat 4 vote totals were certified as the mayoral results.

Palm Beach was the home of the Butterfly Ballot in the disastrous 2000 Presidential “Election”; that more than 16,000 votes were unaccounted for in a 2008 primary election recount on their Sequoia Voting Systems optical-scan systems; that the op-scan systems that year failed to count the same ballots the same way twice in those recounts; that Rush Limbaugh’s touch-screen vote froze on him there during the 2008 Presidential election…

… The systems which will once again be used this November, and which have been used throughout the primary cycle. The systems which failed in Palm Beach were made by Sequoia Voting Systems, which was recently purchased — along with Diebold’s Election Division — by a private Canadian company named Dominion Voting.

With those two acquisitions … Dominion became the second largest e-voting system vendor in the country.

The Palm Beach Post reports Dominion Voting Systems issued a statement earlier this week from Waldeep Singh, a vice president of customer relations. Prior to that, Singh worked for Sequoia. Prior to that, Singh worked for the California Secretary of State. They all work together. Just not for you.

“The incorrect reporting of vote totals which occurred in the Wellington [Palm Beach County] election was caused by a mismatch between the software which generates the paper ballots and the central tally system,” Singh said in his statement.

“This synchronization difficulty is a shortcoming of the version of software currently being used in Palm Beach County and that shortcoming has been addressed in a subsequent version of the software. These enhancements help to prevent such an anomaly from occurring in the future. Dominion is in the process of providing this newer version to Palm Beach County.”

The nice thing about hand-counting paper ballots — other than the fact that citizens can actually oversee the results of their own elections and know the results are accurate, is that nobody has to rely on anybody to “certify” secret vote counting software that, years later, will be found to have been certified inaccurately, as is almost always the case.

Of course, the op-scan failure that happened in Palm Springs this year isn’t all that unusual. What’s so unusual is that anybody actually happened to notice it this time, and that election results may actually be changed this long after an election has been certified in which the wrong candidates were announced as the “winners” of their elections.

.

Do you have something you’d like to share? A link? A joke? Some words of wisdom? A topic to discuss? It’s our nightly Open Thread, and you have the floor.

Covidy PairOdey

There was a pair o’ docs
Who argued in the news

About the pair o’ dimes
Each was accused to use.

There was a pair annoyed
Assigned to separate pews

(Which they would much avoid
If they were free to choose.)

.

There was a pair o’ dice
Apparently lost but loaded

And many a pair o’ phrases
Transparently encoded.

And many pair o’ bollocks
In the learning curve

Describing to the pair o’ normal
How we get what we deserve.

Sign me Up! What Else Will You Pay Me Not To Do??

Thanks to Seanmahair for the link:

“The program will be called the Dream Keeper Fellowship, though likely to be dubbed “Cash for Criminals” in the media, and will pay select people $300 a month to avoid gun incidents.” You can’t make this stuff up, seriously.

Confirmed by another source:

‘Cash For Criminals’: San Francisco Will Start Paying People Not To Shoot Each Other
Nation & State | 9-2-2021 | Tyler Durden

San Francisco may be best known for its poo and needle-covered streets (requiring six-figure ‘poop patrollers‘), but the liberal stronghold – driven into the ground under decades of Democrat leadership – is about to experiment with yet another ‘fix’ for its self-inflicted wounds…
…Using taxpayer money to pay criminals not to shoot people.

In October, San Francisco will begin offering high-risk individuals $300 per month not to shoot anyone, or get shot themselves, according to the San Francisco Examiner. What’s more, participants can earn up to $200 more per month by hitting program milestones – such as landing a job interview, complying with probation, or consistently meeting with a mentor, according to the report.

Known as the “Dream Keeper Fellowship” (a.k.a. Cash for Criminals), “The initiative will pair participants with newly hired life coaches from the Street Violence Intervention Program, known as SVIP, who will help them make the right choices and access services.”

This isn’t the first time a city has tried to reduce gun violence by offering cash. A similar anti-violence program in Oakland, for instance, offers young adults up to $300 for achieving milestones. What’s new is San Francisco would start people off with a baseline of $300 a month without having to meet any marks.

The program is modeled, in part, after the nationally watched Operation Peacemaker Fellowship in Richmond, which offers similar stipends of up to $1,000. …

It’s also not San Francisco’s first guaranteed-income program. The City recently rolled out similar efforts for pregnant mothers from marginalized communities and artists struggling during the pandemic.

The program will start off with just 10 participants in October, and then expand benefits to another 30 high-risk individuals by the end of the year. Officials have already hired two life coaches for the program.

The program, funded in part by the Dream Keeper Initiative established by Mayor London Breed and Supervisor Shamann Walton to divert funding from the police, is being rolled out by the Human Rights Commission and Office of Economic and Workforce Development.

…“We can’t just put them in a program without making sure that they have money, without making sure that they have something to take care of themselves.”

“This is the perfect time for this strategy.”

Afghan All-Girl Robotics Team

Well, here we are again, and the members of an Afghan all-girl robotics team have arrived in Mexico.

They were welcomed by the country’s foreign minister.

The team made headlines earlier this year after making affordable ventilators for coronavirus patients out of car parts.

They previously won a special award at an international competition in the US.

Other members of the team have arrived in Qatar in recent days.

So, I guess if you want a robotic Afghan chick who can help you breathe through car parts, pony up. Because you know they ain’t going back home.

That’s Pulitzer Material, Right There

Is there a Pusilanimous Prize? Might win that, as well.

As Biden repeats claim that ‘Nobody could have known’ Afghan Army would collapse, bombshell transcript from July reveals he pressured Afghan President Ghani to create ‘perception’ Taliban wasn’t winning ‘WHETHER IT’S TRUE OR NOT’
UK Daily Mail | 08/31/2021 | Rob Crilly and Ariel Zilber

President Joe Biden wanted the now-departed Afghan president to create the ‘perception’ that his government was capable of holding off the Taliban – an indication he knew it was only a matter of time before the US ally fell to the Islamic group even while reassuring Americans at home that it would not happen.

In the last phone call between Biden and his Afghan then-counterpart Ashraf Ghani, the American president said they needed to change perceptions of the Taliban’s rapid advance ‘whether it is true or not,’ according to excerpts published on Tuesday.

Four weeks before Kabul collapsed, Ghani pleaded for more air support and money for soldiers who had not had a pay rise in a decade.

A transcript obtained by Reuters reveals two leaders oblivious to the impending disaster and an American president focused on spinning the message.

‘I need not tell you the perception around the world and in parts of Afghanistan, I believe, is that things are not going well in terms of the fight against the Taliban,’ Biden said.

‘And there is a need, whether it is true or not, there is a need to project a different picture.’