Psychologists say that “moral outrage” is actually just a self-serving tool people use to convince themselves that they’re virtuous.
Shhh! Not so loud! Do you want to get hashtagged?
Psychologists say that “moral outrage” is actually just a self-serving tool people use to convince themselves that they’re virtuous.
Shhh! Not so loud! Do you want to get hashtagged?
“a self-serving tool people use to convince themselves that they’re virtuous.” And this is different from outrage in general in what particular fashion? Or are immoral outrages the only kind permitted to be voiced?
What Walrus said.
I’m outraged that psychologists don’t know correlation does not equal causation.
(Or tautology: “Moral outrage at things perceived as non-virtuous is felt by people who think themselves virtuous.” Hmm.)
An impressive percentage of people who consider themselves virtuous will inevitably show moral outrage at the world today.
Which came first — the shockin’ or the eg (-regiousness)?
That’s outrageous!
“Psychologists?”
Quacks.
…actually just a self-serving tool
peopleliberals use to convincethemselvesother people that they’re virtuous.That would explain their obsession with 12 year old bumper stickers and black lives matter signs in the yard of their $3million house in an area where no black life…lives. Among many other things.