President Obama says we’ll now make two new nuclear reactors. I think that’s a good thing, but I have some concerns. We don’t trust Iran with nuclear material, so should we really trust Obama? It’s not that I think Obama is up to anything nefarious, but the nuclear material is really serious stuff and I’m not sure about it in the hands of someone whose main experience is community organizing and editing a college newspaper. Doesn’t it ever worry you he has access to nukes? The guy can’t talk to schoolkids without a teleprompter and yet he can kills millions within seconds. I just hope we have someone responsible in charge of that stuff — and not like a Communist or a domestic terrorist from Obama’s handpicked staff.
Again, I don’t think he’s going to nuke anyone or expose a city to radiation — purposely. But, you know, it’s worth worrying about.
He could put Amy Bishop, the crazy college shooting professor, in charge. She is female, liberal, unstable, and knows Science!. What more could Teh One require for the job, besides Hugo Chavez. But he is kind of busy right now.
Your right! it is something we could be worrying about. And, seeing as I dont have anything else to relly worry bout today, I’ll join you in the worry, so’s ya dont worry alone. Of course, I wont join you in your worry, if that would be worrisome….
The two new reactors seem to be planned for Savannah, GA, right where the large collection of military nuke plants are now. I suspect the plan is to replace two aged reactors with two new ones. Big deal.
What is even more funny is that Obama expects to tie new nuke plants – all TWO of them – to passage of Cap & Trade legislation on carbon emissions from industry. Such legislation, also known as “Honey, why did our electric bill go up $500 last month?” has zero chance of passage right now.
“Here, kid, have some candy. You just have to get in my beat up old van to get it,” said the strange man. “No thanks, you vile perv,” replied the child, who then told his father, who beat up the perv and had him arrested.
Well lets see Obama can’t be trusted with buckets, he can’t be trusted with money, he can’t be trusted with a government, why should I trust him with reactors?
No, Frank. “Nucular Obama.” He inherited it from Bush, along with his nucular strategery.
Barry, before you get us those nukes. I’ll take mine with sugar no cream, and maybe one of those danishes.
I just hope we have someone responsible in charge of that stuff
Don’t worry, Joe Biden’s on the job.
Boy howdy, are we in trouble. Can be compared to giving a kid matches and a can of gasoline.
I have the answer:Giant nuclear powered fans to blow on windmills!!
It’ll create or save hundreds of jobs in France, Germany and Japan and the cold wind will solve
global warmingclimate change.They could even hook up some really bright
light bulbsCFLs and shine them on solar panels too….AT NIGHT!!That will teach all you deniers that solar power works!!
Hard to believe nobody has thought of this already.
I asked for a free unicorn, not a free radioactive unicorn.
NASA will be tasked with obtaining solar power directly from the sun
with a long extention cord,
and instructions to land at night, for safety.
When Barry says ‘nukes’ he’s thinking of microwave ovens.
Terry_Jim, you have plagiarized an old Aggie joke, NTTAWWT. But I thought you should know.
Here’s another: An Aggie was standing at the side of his convertible sports car in a parking lot, looking sad and worried. I asked him what was wrong, and he said, “I locked my keys in the car.” I pointed out that the car’s folding top was down, and the Aggie said, “Yeah, and I’m worried that it might rain.”
Ta-Da!
Well, when your plan to fight debt is to create massive levels of debt, it would stand to reason that your plan to keep citizens free from radioactive fallout would be to release massive levels of radioactive fallout.