CAUTION: Contains discussions of modern art, so NSFW
[YouTube direct link] (Viewer #437,807)
Looking for actual art designed with actual aesthetic standards? Try Quent Cordair Fine Art.
IRONY: Contains some artistic nudity, so also NSFW
CAUTION: Contains discussions of modern art, so NSFW
[YouTube direct link] (Viewer #437,807)
Looking for actual art designed with actual aesthetic standards? Try Quent Cordair Fine Art.
IRONY: Contains some artistic nudity, so also NSFW
In his list of ways to take back art, he did not mention de-funding the National Endowment for the Arts, which reflexively funds the new, the ugly and the profane over the aesthetically pleasing – for the very reason that rational art patrons won’t pay for that muck. Progs are always in charge of government handouts.
I can proudly boast that I’ve never accepted one thin dime from the National Endowment for the Arts!
(I’d rather move to Minnesota and make a living trapping pocket gophers for the bounty money.)
http://www.startribune.com/sports/outdoors/37754879.html
Curse you Harvey!! This little clip sent me on a YouTube odyssey of Prager University clips…. and 1-1/2 hours later, I am much better aligned with the universe…. and want to choke a liberal.
Alignment = good
Choking Liberal = bad
Can I just slap a hippie instead?
I can actually enjoy abstract, non-representative works like actual Pollock paintings on an aesthetic level, but a lot of today’s “art” is just plain awful. It’s the difference between Duchamp’s “Nude Descending a Staircase” (which actually looks really cool) and his “L.H.O.O.Q.” (which is just a mustache on the Mona Lisa).
And don’t you dare claim your collection of paint splatters is a statement on American consumerism.