I’m used to Ebert (who is my favorite movie critic) sometimes jarringly inserting a left-wing political viewpoint into a movie review, but the political mention in this review of the new Luc Besson movie jumped out at me more than any previous one because it’s a polite mention of one of the most caustic conservatives. I wonder what the story behind this is?
This is supposed to be a humor site, Frank.
That was just creepy.
Is that the same eggbert guy from sikel & eggbert? I thought they was dead.
It was creepy.
I am still shaking, please don’t say things like that again.
CitzCom
Hmmm…that was nice. I think he may just have a crush on her. I bet a lot of liberal men have crushes on her and the whole “pie in the face” thing is just a modern day “dipping the braid in the inkwell” sort of action. I’m done psychoanalyzing now.
Disturbing, indeed.
Eggbert is a mucho lefty.
Q: What’s the sexiest thing Ann Coulter could wear?
A: A long, black Supreme Court robe!
Yowza!
Whoa! Jimmyb, You made my day and gave me an image to smile about all day.
lol
3 chears to jimmyb!
lol and ann of couse is right, i mean do any of us doubt that once frankj and sarahk put the cufs…i mean the rings on this site will get a lot more tame…prob no more argentian cheerleaders :(….
Luc Besson is such a smart writer.
Hey, so is Anne Coulter.
Anne Coulter is a lot hotter, though. Not that Luc doesn’t look good in a spaghetti strap dress, but Anne pulls it off like few others can.
Ebert’s review fails, however, to answer the question one always asks about a Luc Besson movie:
Will there be strange and inappropriate usage of rifle grenades in it?
Ebert’s a dirty old man who can’t be objective about any movie with Jennifer Lopez. He also supports terrorists. Google Ebert terrorist and see what shows up.
While this wouldn’t exactly be a match made in heaven (although Carville and Matlin seem to have a good thing going), Ebert and Coulter could be good for each other. She could teach him to be a bit less of a loony lefty moonbat, and he could teach her to actually, you know, eat a square meal once in a while.
And I absolutely with JimmyB: She’d look FABULOUS in a Supreme Court robe, just as Michelle Malkin would look (even more) fab being sworn in as Secretary of Homeland Security and Condi would look (even more) fab sitting behind the big desk at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
You got that right, DocJim!
Maybe they would be good together…
She wouldn’t say anything about Ebert’s post-cancer facial droop.
He wouldn’ say anything about her freakishly fish-eye body that I saw on Time’s cover.
Pardon me as I try to pry my jaw off the floor. I’m actually impressed with Ebert, he was actually nice.
Notice: Ebert merely said that Coulter was right, women ARE a civilizing influence on men. If you don’t believe Coulter, just look at FrankJ. 🙂 Besides, just because he’s a Lefty doesn’t mean he’s ALWAYS wrong…. give a blind man a machinegun, he’ll eventually get a bullseye.