Qualifications for advising on climate change: ‘checking the temperature’ of blondes he’s not married to.

Philandering Democrat and failed 1988 presidential candidate Gary Hart is reduced to pimping the “State of the Climate” assessment delivered to the White House on the eve of President Bush’s “state of the nation” address. This assessment was prepared by the Presidential Climate Action Project, a “non-partisan” group awash in socialist lapdogs.
Since few people have the stomach to read this commie pap sandwich, I’ve taken the liberty of digesting it for you, and will vomit the remains into your hungry minds like a doting mother bird:

The “State of the Climate” declaration urges ten steps that must be taken before the 44th president delivers the next state of the union address:

Or we will all die.

1) Recognize that climate change transcends politics and partisanship.

Code for “Republicans need to shut the hell up so that we can inflict our superior wisdom on the benighted masses.”

2) To reverse our catastrophic slide, accept that sacrifices will be required.

And accept that when there are sacrifices, there are those who make them and those who collect them. Guess which group PCAP plans to fall into?

3) Acknowledge that climate action requires a new national energy policy.

Here’s a policy – kill anyone who causes a temperature change of more than ten degrees. Mission accomplished.

4) Recognize that our national security is at stake with climate deterioration.

I assume because increasing temperatures – like everything else – angers the Arab Street.

5) Begin transition to a post-carbon economy. Opening new economic opportunities for all segments of society.

Except those who work in the multi-trillion dollar carbon-based energy part of the economy.

6) Impliment[sic] concrete climate action at home to set the stage for engaging other nations.

So… when the mob put Hoffa in a barrel of cement & dumped him in the harbor, they were just being environmentally prescient?

7) Break the hold of entrenched special interests over our climate policy.

FINALLY something sensible! I sincerely wish PCAP the best of luck in getting Al Gore and the MSM to stifle their yammering cakeholes. If it keeps NBC from having another Eco-Nazi Green Week, I’ll personally cut those boys a check for 20 large.

8) Make a major investment in federal earth sciences research.

Part of good investing is knowing when to cut your losses, so de-funding Gaia-worshipping scam artists would definitely qualify.

9) Evaluate products and energy supplies for climate impact over their lives.

I already do that, which is why I bought a low-efficiency SUV and leave it idling in my driveway 24/7. Pave the Planet, people!

10) Recognize that climate change is the leadership issue of our times.

At least for the people who haven’t been killed by terrorists.
Hey, I’m not saying Hart is an idiot for getting involved in this nonsense, I’m just saying his priorities are skewed.
And THAT makes him an idiot.

There are a lot of evil people in the world there who walk out in the open with no fear. They are called “rulers of other countries.” It’s time this practiced ends. It’s time they end. With all the sniper rifle and bomb technology we have, there is no reason that evil people should rule any country any where in the world… or ever show their face publicly ever again.
It is time America starts systematically killing everyone we know to be bad.
Now, some ask what give us the right to decide who lives and who dies. I answer that the fact that America is superior at everything means we deserve the exclusive right to decide who lives and who dies. Many foreigners are only alive today because America’s existence scares away evil, so we deserve to be able to kill many many people in payment for how many we’ve helped live. If anyone disagrees with this, that’s okay; just don’t do it vocally if you’re a foreign because we can and probably will kill you. That’s what you get for getting in the way of solving the problem that evil people are still breathing.
Frank J. ‘XX for Some Office
“Genociding evil.”

Apparently, the Democrats are having some inner-party race war. Apparently Bill Clinton compared Obama’s South Carolina win to that of Jesse Jackson’s who won solely by getting the black vote. Now, any comparison of anyone to Jesse Jackson for any reason is fighting words, but apparently the first black president, Billy Jeff, is trying to stir up white people against their black oppressors who are denying them the first woman president by implying that the only reason anyone is voting for Obama is because of his skin color. Interestingly, the Democrat vote in SC was something like 61% female (really, you have to be pretty dickless to vote for any of those nanny-state ninnies), so it’s more of a race war between white women and black men. I don’t know where the Hispanics are going to land, but I’d like to remind them that the Republican Party will welcome them with open arms (just make sure you have your proof of citizenship handy).
Interesting that while the Republicans are floundering, the Democrats are violently ripping themselves apart. No matter how badly Republicans fail, we can always count on the Democrats to fail even more spectacularly (which is why both parties are crap right now). The Clinton “watch out for the scary black voter” strategy will probably work, too, since it’s pretty well known that if you scratch a liberal, you reveal a ginormous racist. You don’t get that patronizing by actually respecting your fellow man.

Obama had a huge win in South Carolina, and I, for one, welcome our new Obama overlord. I’d like to remind him that as a trusted blogger personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in his underground healthcare caves.

We no longer live in Florida. Stop bothering us.
That goes for you especially, Charlie Crist.

I just realized that I haven’t even thought about checking out Daily Kos in weeks. They just haven’t seemed very relevant since the primary got underway.
Not that IMAO is very relevant, but we don’t have a yearly convention that most major Republicans attend (though that would be cool).

The ironically-named Center for Public Integrity posted 935 of the Bush administration’s statements about Iraq that it claims “methodically propagated erroneous information over the two years beginning on Sept. 11, 2001”.
In response, IMAO has created its own website which lists all the methodically propagated accurate information uttered by Democrats since 9/11.
Screenshot in the extended entry…

Continue reading ‘I Notice There Aren’t Any Quotes About Mass Graves’ »

So, the New York Times endorsed McCain, something being touted by every candidate except McCain, though McCain does have the endorsement on his site. That’s being a maverick to the point of sheer stupidity.
You figure this has to hurt him. His big issue is he’s the best candidate for the Iraq War, but he just got the endorsement of perhaps the most prominent “defeat at any cost” douches.
So, do you think the New York Times editorial board knew what they were doing? If they were at all strategic, they would have praised the candidate they hated most and trashed the candidate they really wanted to win (incidentally, the NYT only singled out Giuliani as a target of their impotent anger); they could really affect the election outcome that way. I think the NYT is too arrogant for that, though. Anyway, this combined with whether this is true might be enough to sink McCain, paving the way for a Romney victory. Yay vanilla ice cream! It’s so… there!
Editor’s Note: Though the title of this post is meant to be a rhetorical question, the answer is, of course, Ron Paul, the only hope for America.

There was another Republican debate last night, but this one I haven’t bother reading the reactions to. Who cares anymore? Plus, who doesn’t know all about the candidates by this point? I’m guessing all you blog readers know them pretty well, but apparently there are a number of primary voters who were too busy licking the paint on the walls to do much studying about the candidates.
I think the only way I could get interested in the primary process again is if I had money riding on it.

So Sylvester Stallone endorsed John McCain. My question: How can anyone tell that from the guttural mumbling he uses as speech?

REPORTER: So what do you think of John McCain?
STALLONE: Ra rur ruh rur uh ruh.

Now everyone is asking who would win in a fight between Stallone and Chuck Norris. Obviously it’s Chuck Norris… especially if it’s an enunciation battle.