Hand this group of bozos a trillion dollars, and expect they will come up with a solution to all our financial problems over a weekend? Hell to the no.

Here’s what the genius who has come up with the plan to save us said last March.  It would be interesting to know what happened in the last 6 months that so drastically changed the situation–in other words, have they all just been fiddling while Rome burned, or is this whole thing a crock.  Why does an emergency massive bailout come out of the blue all of a sudden?  I can’t wait to read a book on this in a couple years–hopefully we won’t be in a depression by the time it comes out.

Articles after the split . . .

 

Paulson upbeat despite economy woes

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The U.S. economy is going through a “tough patch,” Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Sunday, insisting that the proper steps were being made to turn things around.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says the No. 1 priority in the economic arena is to minimize instability. An upbeat Paulson refused to say whether he believes the economy is in a recession. “I’m not focused right now on what you call it,” he told CNN’s “Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer.” “We know the economy has slowed down, and the American people know it’s slowed down. So the important thing is, what do you do about it?”

A number of economists have said they believe the U.S. economy is already in a recession, which many economists define as two successive quarters of negative economic growth. A top Senate Democrat, Charles Schumer of New York, Sunday accused President Bush of having failed to act on the nation’s critical economic troubles in a way “reminiscent of Herbert Hoover” around the time of the Great Depression. But Paulson said the $170 billion economic stimulus plan President Bush signed last month “is going to make a real difference” starting in May, when the first electronic payments are to be made. The rebates will put the money in the hands of individuals in the hope that they will spend it and boost the faltering economy.

Though the country lost 85,000 jobs during the first two months of 2008, Paulson said those figures did not tell the whole story. “Remember, we had 52 months where we added jobs to the economy; unemployment is 4.8 percent,” he said. “If the stimulus package works, we will add 500,000 to 600,000 additional jobs this year.”

Home foreclosures are also up as the subprime mortgage market continues to founder, with 223,000 reported last month versus fewer than 140,000 in February 2007. But Paulson again expressed confidence. “We’ve been focused on that early,” he said, citing legislation in Congress to help 300,000 struggling subprime borrowers. Some lawmakers have said the administration failed to address the mounting problem when it should have. Critics of the new legislation believe it may not help as many borrowers as the government suggests.

Paulson said the tumble in home prices resulting from the mortgage mess is not necessarily bad. “We had a number of years where there was unsustainable appreciation in home prices — California, Florida, Arizona, Nevada — and we’re seeing a correction right now.” Paulson acknowledged that the dollar is weak, having dropped to a historic low against the euro amid inflation fears, but he downplayed its long-term significance. “Every economy goes through some ups and downs,” he said. “We are going through a tough patch right now in our economy. The long-term fundamentals are strong, and they compare favorably throughout the world.”

Paulson defended last week’s decision by the Treasury to bail out Bear Stearns, an investment bank heavily invested in the subprime mortgage market, but would not say what might have happened had the government failed to step in. “I’m not going to speculate about what-ifs,” he said. “I’m just going to say our clear priority right now — our No. 1 priority, everything we’re doing in the economic arena — is to minimize instability, minimize spillover into the real economy.” He acknowledged that the nation’s capital markets have been going through turmoil “for a while,” but described the setbacks as “bumps in the road.” “There are going to be unpleasant surprises, you’re going to find that an institution or so has problems and, when they do have problems, you work to deal with it,” he said, adding that handling the matter occupied much of his weekend.

Paulson’s positive view was countered by Schumer who accused the administration of having failed to take steps that have already moved the economy into recession.  “The president is, indeed, behaving like Herbert Hoover,” Schumer told “Fox News Sunday.”“We’re in the most serious economic problem we’ve been in in a very long time, much worse than 2001. The president’s hands-off attitude is reminiscent of Herbert Hoover in 1929, in 1930.” He added, “There is no confidence by Democrats, Republicans, leaders of Wall Street, leaders of Main Street in this administration. And it’s a real problem that builds on itself.”

Paulson defends Bear Stearns bailout

WASHINGTON: The U.S. treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, defended on Sunday the Federal Reserve’s decision to help rescue Bear Stearns, the teetering Wall Street investment bank. He sidestepped questions about whether other financial firms were on shaky ground and the possibility of additional interventions of this kind, saying, “I’m convinced that they’re going to come out of this situation very strong.”

Paulson also sought to send a calming message that the administration of President George W. Bush is on top of the turbulent situation. “The government is prepared to do what it takes” to ease turmoil in the financial system and minimize any damage to the U.S. economy, Paulson said during a series of broadcast interviews. The Fed’s intervention “was not a difficult decision. It was the right decision.”

The Fed, using a procedure from the Depression era of the 1930s, raced to the aid of Bear Stearns on Friday alongside JPMorgan Chase. Bear Stearns had made a fortune in mortgage-backed securities but faced a possible collapse after those investments soured. Wall Street plunged as fears spread about whether other big firms were in jeopardy. “When you go through a period like this,” Paulson said, “policy makers need to balance various consequences.”

Some critics contend that the Fed’s move was akin to a government bailout – something the Bush administration has repeatedly said it is against. “Well, every situation is different. We have to respond to the circumstances we’re facing today,” Paulson said. “And my concern is to minimize the impact on the broader economy as we work our way through this situation and, again, the stability of our financial situation.” The financial system, he said, is “more fragile than we would like right now.”

Bush planned to meet Monday with his advisory panel on financial markets, whose members include Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and Paulson.

12 Comments

  1. Since the WordPress changeover made comments post so much faster, the short-attention-span MFL trolls are now able to barf out their idiocy that much quicker.

    I like the old site. It took so stinkin’ long to submit a comment that the trolls forgot what they were doing.

  2. Yeah, Flavious, and there’s Nancy “The Fungus” Pelosi with her hands in her lap (trying to cut off the stench?) and a shit-eating, cover her do-nothing Congress’s ass, grin on her face.

    All day long they were claiming they had a deal “in principle.” Then, when it fell through thanks to House Republicans, they blamed McCain.

    Question for Democrats: Since you have the majority in both Houses of Congress, why do you need Republican’s to support the bailout?

    Answer: So they can blame them later.

  3. Yeah, Flavious, and there’s Nancy “The Fungus” Pelosi with her hands in her lap (trying to cut off the stench?) and a $hit-eating, cover her do-nothing Congress’s a$$, grin on her face.

    All day long they were claiming they had a deal “in principle.” Then, when it fell through thanks to House Republicans, they blamed McCain.

    Question for Democrats: Since you have the majority in both Houses of Congress, why do you need Republican’s to support the bailout?

    Answer: So they can blame them later.

  4. What happened to preview? How are we supposed to know if we did the html tags correctly?

    And, I liked the numbered comments. If a troll had a reeeeeaaaaallllllly long name, it was just easier to just say “Hey! #X! STFU and DIAF!!!”

    Also, the quality of trolls has actually gone down since the change. JEEEEEZZ!!! They really expect us to believe they support Mitt?

  5. “Romney2012 Says:
    September 26th, 2008 at 1:00 am

    Where’s Mitt Romney when you need him? Oh yeah someone had to go and pick a stupid loser from Alaska instead. ”

    Yes, because the VP CANDIDATE has so much influence over the economy! Wait… no.. that is not right. Stupid Obama Troll.

  6. It’s all in the visual: BHusseinO is already wringing his hands: “Rev. Wright, BFF Ayers, Hero Ahmadinejad, and BabyMama Oprah, what should I do, what should I do?”

    1. Incompetence should not be rewarded.
    2. The bailout scheme is a Demoncrat ploy against the Repubs.
    3. The bailout will not work; it will defeat permanently the middle class.
    4. The Repubs are not fiscally conservative enough to see through it.
    5. “Hand this group of bozos… ” a one-way ticket to Alaska where they will be forced to learn how the taxpayer actually receives money back from the government; how to sell their planes and mansions so the people don’t have to foot the bill; and especially how to cut wood, make their own mukluks, fry musk ox in blubber, and drink without their pinkies raised. Oh, and how to get along.

    Truly a graphic photo of cruel and unusual punishment of We The People.

  7. Apparently, negotiations failed the minute Obama opened his mouth. So apparently he was right about one thing, he should be in Mississippi, not in DC.
    Ever.

    Dirty Harry Reid’s issuing a statement saying they needed McCain in DC to solve the crisis, then when McCain agrees, issuing another saying he isn’t needed was pure scumbag politics. Unfortunately, I have yet to meet a Democrat with a long enough memory or deep enough morality to recognize that.

    Apparently Biden stopped by just in time to try to saddle the bill with another equivalent-to-NASAs-annual-budget package of earmarks. Way to go, slow Joe! So glad to have you working for us!

    We have to remember one thing, Nero didn’t just fiddle while Rome burned, he blamed Christians for it, brutally tortured to death any he could find, and used the land that was cleared by the fire to build a huge palace for himself. Strange that the fire took place in the exact area he wanted to clear for a palace. Strange that after dodging debates all season, Obama suddenly sees this debate as being more important than the stability of the entire country. Strange that Reid issues contradictory statements based on politics rather than facts. Strange that Pelosi tells people what they want to hear all week while excluding the very groups from negotiations she insists must go along with the bill.

    Fiddling while Rome burns implies musical talent. The Democrats have an entirely more base location for their rhythmic hand movements at the moment.

  8. Any bailout plan that doesn’t involve seizing the assets of the people doing those derivatives(if they are legal they certainly are not ethical ) is a payola scheme. They keep wanting to give the money to those people that got us into the trouble to begin with. How does that solve the problem?

Leave a Reply to Bob in Feenicks Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.