The problem is that this kind of vilification and over-the-top rhetoric closes the door to the possibility of compromise. It undermines democratic deliberation. It prevents learning — since, after all, why should we listen to a “fascist,” or a “socialist,” or a “right-wing nut,” or a left-wing nut”? It makes it nearly impossible for people who have legitimate but bridgeable differences to sit down at the same table and hash things out. It robs us of a rational and serious debate, the one we need to have about the very real and very big challenges facing this nation. It coarsens our culture, and at its worst, it can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response.
BARACK OBAMA, remarks at University of Michigan, May 1, 2010
If you right-wing nuts oppose me, I will send signals to my progressive thug-buddies, and they will bite your fingers off.
Mayday. Seems appropriate…
Translation: “Anyone who calls me names is a poopy-head.”
Keep this in mind as the weenies on the right speak in their self-defeating and moderate way. “The distinguished gentleman from NY may want to consider…” means “I am selling out if I get a good offer.”