NBA: Nothing But Athletes

I confess: the primary reason for this is that I just wanted an excuse to post this photo of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, poster boy for corporate sports.

Yowza! I was going to make this a “Caption This Photo” contest, but without context it’s nothing:

NBA Commissioner: “We Certainly Didn’t Apologize To The Chinese Government”
Hotair | 10/17/2019 | John Sexton

Commissioner Adam Silver told TMZ Sports that’s he’s bothered so many people think the NBA knuckled under and apologized to China over Daryl Morey’s tweet supporting Hong Kong’s freedom.

The initial statement read, “We recognize that the views expressed by Houston Rockets General Manager Daryl Morey have deeply offended many of our friends and fans in China, which is regrettable.”

“While Daryl has made it clear that his tweet does not represent the Rockets or the NBA, the values of the league support individuals’ education themselves and sharing their views on matters important to them.” Silver explained to TMZ Sports … “It bothered me that in saying we regretted upsetting hundreds of millions of Chinese fans while at the same time supporting Daryl Morey’s speech, it bothered me, I’d say, that it was interpreted as an apology to the Chinese government.”

“We certainly didn’t apologize to the Chinese government.”

. . .

But the new version of reality being offered by Silver and Stern also fails to mention a couple of other things, starting with the fact that the NBA published two different versions of the statement, one in English and one in Mandarin for Chinese fans. As the Associated Press pointed out, the two statements were very different in tone.

. . .

Silver and Stern also fail to mention the apology to China by [Houston Rockets star] James Harden: “We apologize. You know, we love China. We love playing there.”


The Dalai Lamarick

A long ball hitter, I heard
But always with a compassionate word
Peace in his eyes;
Yet the Nobel Prize…


Cool Science

There’s no joke here.

Just some compelling science that will surely develop in the coming years — the wave of the future, perhaps.

For those of you with an aptitude for that kind of stuff —I’m looking at you, FrankJ.

Argonne [National Laboratory] Explores How Ants, Bees, and Fruit Flies Can Be the Next Big Buzz in Artificial Intelligence
Argonne National Laboratory | 12 Sept 2019 | Dave Bukey and Mary Fitzpatrick

Space. The final frontier.

And on Nov. 2, 2018, NASA’s Voyager 2 spacecraft crossed into the vastness of interstellar space, following Voyager 1, which made the leap six years earlier. Since their launch in 1977, the two probes have traveled more than 11 billion miles across the solar system, lasting much longer than scientists anticipated.

Powered by plutonium and drawing 400 watts of power each to run their electronics and heat, the probes still snap photos and send them back to NASA. After 42 years, though, only six of Voyager 2’s 10 instruments still work, and NASA scientists expect the probe will go dark in 2025, well before it leaves our Solar system.

But what if Voyager 2 needed only a couple of watts of power? Could it survive long enough to continue its explorations far into the future?

These are the types of questions that scientists are asking at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory. Here, Angel Yanguas-Gil, principal materials scientist in the Applied Materials division, is leading an interdisciplinary team that is rethinking the design of computer chips to not only perform and adapt better, but to do so using a minuscule amount of power — around one watt.

For inspiration, the team is looking to the brains of insects, such as ants, bees, and fruit flies — which offer a new frontier in a type of artificial intelligence known as neuromorphic computing. What they have found could turn artificial intelligence on its artificial head.

Inspired by biology, the team’s newly designed computer chips, which rely on new blueprints and materials, can bypass the “cloud” to learn on the fly, radically conserve power and adapt to extreme environments, such as deep space and radioactive areas — all while delivering reliable, accurate results.

The soft underbelly of artificial intelligence
. . .

How is artificial intelligence inflexible? The answer lies in how a popular form of AI, called a neural network, spots meaningful arrangements in data. Most neural networks, which uncover patterns and relationships in data without explicit programming, are static, designed for a specific task, such as recognizing images. Once a network learns that task, it can’t switch gears and start driving a car.

“The scene changes, the distribution of data is slightly different than before, and what you learned no longer applies,” explained Sandeep Madireddy, a computer scientist in Argonne’s Mathematics and Computer Science (MCS) division, who has joined Yanguas-Gil’s team.

Insects, on the other hand, are versatile and can solve problems in different ways, said Yanguas-Gil.

“In a biological system, the network can learn by itself and offers a much higher degree of flexibility,” he said. “Evolutionary pressure on insects produces very efficient, adaptive computing machines. Bees, for instance, exhibit half the number of distinct cognitive behaviors of dolphins, just in a much smaller volume.”

Accurate under pressure
To prove this point, Yanguas-Gil and Argonne chemists Jeff Elam and Anil Mane designed and simulated a new neuromorphic chip inspired by the tiny brain structure of bees, fruit flies and ants. The team created a network from scratch that contains two pivotal discoveries:

• Dynamic filters and weights that change the strength of various neural connections, depending on what the system finds important in real time.
• Tungsten‐aluminum oxide, an award-winning nanocomposite material created by Elam and Mane, which would allow the chip to operate at power levels far below one watt. (By contrast, graphics processing units [GPUs], based on conventional silicon semiconductor processing, can consume 100 watts or more per chip.)

Testing of the new chip design revealed that it was as accurate as the standard design, but it learned much more quickly and retained its accuracy — even under 60 percent error rates in its internal operation.

“With neural networks, error rates of 20 percent erode the system’s accuracy,” said Yanguas-Gil. “Our system can tolerate much higher error rates and sustain the same accuracy as a perfect system. This makes it a good candidate for machines that spend 30 years in space.”

Future Headlines

Feel free to come up with a probable headline of your own…


Fastest-Healing Mouse in All Mexico Predicts Speedy Recovery

Halloween Etiquette: Can’t Say Boo
Founder of Wuss Nation Says Use of the Word “Boo!” Is Wuss-Phobic
Millions Point Out the Oxymoron


Straight Line of the Day: Hillary Is Desperate To Know: How Did the Russians Influence Your Vote?

Straight Line of the Day: Hillary is desperate to know: How did the Russians influence your vote?

Cut and Pastiche

From the UK’s Independent (10/19/17):

North Korea Threatens “Unimaginable” Strike on U.S. After Military Drills

North Korea has threatened to launch an “unimaginable” strike on the US, accusing the Trump administration and its South Korean “puppet” allies of seeking to “ignite a war on the Korean peninsula at any cost”.

The statement released by the Korean Central News Agency, Pyongyang’s official’s mouthpiece, predicted “imminent catastrophic disaster” in the region.

Using typically hyperbolic language, it vowed to “mercilessly smash the war frenzy of the US and South Korean puppet warmongers to get rid of the abyss of ruin through dangerous war gambling and inflict the most miserable death on the invaders.”

North Korea’s statement added: “The US is running amuck by introducing under our nose the targets we have set as primary ones.”

“The US should expect that it would face unimaginable strike at an unimaginable time.”

. . . and, in related news:

Democrats Threaten “Unimaginable” Strike on Trump After Intelligence Agency Spying

Democrats have threatened to launch an “unimaginable” strike on US president Donald Trump, accusing the Trump administration and its Republican “puppet” allies of seeking to “ignite a war on American soil at any cost”.

The statement released by CNN, the Democrat official’s mouthpiece, predicted “imminent catastrophic disaster” in the nation.

Using typically hyperbolic language, it vowed to “mercilessly smash the non-war frenzy of the president and Republican puppet non-warmongers to get rid of the abyss of ruin through dangerous war gambling and inflict the most miserable death on the climate deniers.”

The Democrat/CNN statement added: “Trump is running amuck by introducing under our nose the targets we have set as primary ones.”

“Deplorables should expect that they would face imaginable strikes at a pretty imaginable time.”

Surrender of Cornwallis

Gen. Charles O’Hara surrendering to Gen. Benjamin Lincoln.

The Revolutionary War didn’t officially end until the Treaty of Paris in 1783, but the war effectively ended on October 19, 1781 with the surrender of British forces led by their general, The Earl Cornwallis.

Cornwallis signed the surrender document, but didn’t attend the surrender ceremony. General Charles O’Hara tried to surrender to French general Jean-Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur, the Count of Rochambeau, but Rochambeau pointed him to Gen. Washington, who in turn pointed him to his second-in-command, Gen. Benjamin Lincoln.

Washington’s troops had over 7,000 prisoners to deal with, partly because the rescue Cornwallis was wishing for eventually arrived, but left after seeing all the French ships there. Everything eventually worked out, though.

This is a great day in U.S. History. The Revolution was won.

Friday Night Open Thread

I love Weird Al.


[The YouTube]

Do you have something you’d like to share? A link? A joke? Some words of wisdom? A topic to discuss? It’s Friday Night Open Thread.

What’s on your mind?

The Outer Limericks

In space no one hears you scream
So it should be a liberal’s dream:
“We have the con”
Spend “To infinity — and beyond!” …


Who Else Would Have a Lawyer Named “Harder”? Who Else Would Go Up Against One Named “Vigilante”?

Trump Campaign To Sue CNN For “Substantial Payment” After Project Veritas Undercover Exposé
The Epoch Times | 10-18-19 | Jack Phillips

The Trump administration plans to sue CNN over bias and “wrongful practices” following revelations contained in a recent Project Veritas undercover exposé.

In a four-page letter to CNN, its CEO Jeff Zucker and Executive VP David Vigilante, Trump attorney Charles J. Harder provided several examples of bias against Trump, who seeks “a substantial payment of damages.”

Listing several examples from the just-released Project Veritas videotapes of CNN insiders describing Zucker’s demand for “impeachment above all else,” Harder wrote that they “are merely the tip of the iceberg of the evidence my clients have accumulated over recent years.”

He added, “Never in the history of this country has a President been the subject of such a sustained barrage of unfair, unfounded, unethical and unlawful attacks by so-called ‘mainstream’ news, as the current situation.”


Mormon Labe

Utah Leads States in Gun Sale Growth Over Past Decade, Study Shows
KSL.com | 10/17/2019

SALT LAKE CITY — As lawmakers heard statistics Wednesday on the state of gun crime in Utah, a new study shows Utah’s rate of gun ownership has increased more than any other state over the past decade.

. . . Utah’s rate of gun sales per 1,000 adults grew 80.4% between 2009 and 2018.

Only the District of Columbia, which recorded a jump of over 600%, had a greater increase.

. . . scientifically proving, by global warming’s standards, that Mitt Romney’s presence anywhere leads to an increase in gun purchases. What the heck is his carbine footprint?

Utah also posted a low age-adjusted rate of gun-related homicides per 100,000 population — 2.2, tied for sixth-fewest . . .

Hmm. You’d think they would have buried that lack of correlation a little bit better.

I’m also curious what an “age-adjusted rate of gun-related homicides” even means. Either you homicide someone or you don’t, even if you’re a newborn with an Uzi. (Catch phrase for preemie Terminator: “I C U!”)

“Without a doubt, the American relationship to guns is long and complex,” the report said in its conclusion, “seemingly growing more complex by the day.”

Sniper rifles are long and complex. Americans’ relationship to them is not.

The relationship does not get a Facebook category of “it’s complicated.” Geez, guns haven’t even changed their preferred pronouns since the country began.

(If the Second Amendment’s twenty-seven words are “growing more complex by the day,” just imagine how complex they’ll be by the time Mandatory Gun Buy-Back Day rolls around!)


Wait. What?

NOT from the Babylon Bee:

Hillary Clinton Floats Conspiracy That Tulsi Gabbard Is Being ‘Groomed’ by Russians
Fox News | 10/18/2019

Hillary Clinton in a new interview appeared to float a conspiracy theory that the Russians are “grooming” Hawaii congresswoman and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard to be a third-party candidate in 2020, while claiming 2016 Green Party nominee Jill Stein is “also” a Russian asset.

I can’t stess this enough: this is not from the the Babylon Bee:

“I’m not making any predictions but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said, in apparent reference to Gabbard. “She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”

Not from the Babylon Bee:

She then accused Stein, who ran against her and Donald Trump in 2016, of also being an asset of Russia: “That’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she’s also a Russian asset.”

First of all, Tulsi’s pretty well-groomed already. Stein — well, Russkies must’ve done a poor job, after all these years.

Second of all, Clinton has not yet accused Fox News of being a Russian asset for reporting this, or you for reading it. But stay tuned.


Apropos the Previous Post

Winston Churchill wrote about Kaiser Wilhelm II, but he could also have been writing about Obama the “I”:

Imagine on every side the thunderous tributes of crowd-loyalty and the skilled unceasing flattery of courtierly adulation.

“You are,” they say, “the All-Highest. . . . It is for you to choose the Chancellor and the Ministers of State; it is for you to choose the chiefs of the Army and Navy. . . . Each word you utter is received by all present with rapture, or at least respect. You have but to form a desire, and it is granted. Limitless wealth and splendor attend your every step. . . . Should you weary of the grosser forms of flattery, far more subtle methods will be applied. . . . Intimate friends are at hand to report day by day how deeply impressed this or that great expert was with your marvelous grasp of his subject. The General Staff seem awed by your comprehension of the higher strategy. The diplomats are wonder-struck by your manly candor or patient restraint, as the case may be. . . . And this goes on day after day and year after year. . . .

Foreign policy:

Just strut about and pose and rattle the undrawn sword. All he wished was to feel like Napoleon, and to be like him without having to fight his battles. Surely less than this would not pass muster. If you are the summit of a volcano, the least you can do is to smoke.

And looking towards the future:

What a contrast twelve years would show! A broken man. . . .

An awful fate! Was it the wage of guilt or incapacity? There is, of course, a point where incapacity and levity are so flagrant that they become tantamount to guilt. Nevertheless history should incline toward the more charitable view. . . .

But the defense which can be made will not be flattering to his self-esteem. It is, in short, rather on the lines of the defense which the eminent French counsel presented on behalf of Marshal Bazaine when he was brought to trial for treason in the surrender of Metz: “This is no traitor. Look at him: he is only a blunderer.”

Why Trump Thinks Obama Was Pretty Great

Usually, when a President comes to office, there’s no — you have no vacancies. Or the previous President would have — boom. There should be no vacancy, you know, whatever their ideology is.

But I guess they thought that the crooked one was going to win or something. (Laughter.) So I came in and, in the first couple of days, they said, “By the way…” You know, I had a couple of other things going, too — including the fact that a few minutes after I was sworn in, the Washington Post wrote a story that the impeachment starts right now. You saw that, right? Did you see that?

Right after I got sworn — took the oath of office, they did that story — literally, a very few moments after the swearing-in — that the road to impeachment starts right now.

But I had a lot of other things. But I said during the course of the first very early period, like a week — I said, “By the way, how many federal judgeships do I have?” They said, “Sir, you have 142.” I said, “What?” (Laughter.) “You have 142, sir.” I said, “You’ve got to be kidding. 142? You mean I have two, one, none?” “No, you have 142.”

And President Obama was not very good at getting it done, because, you know, people held him up and everything else. But, with time, you get them all done. You get them done. But he put a big rush on at the end when he saw we were doing well in the polls, and coming up and up, and it wasn’t enough time. So we inherited 142 open federal judgeships, including the court of appeals. (Applause.) First time in history. First time in history anything like that has ever happened.

And then they say, “Oh, he was a great President. Oh, great. He was great.” Great for who? He was great for us. (Laughter.) And in that way, he was. There’s never been a better President for the Republicans in what they consider the most important way . . . Gave us 142 judgeships on the first day in office. (Laughter.)

Remarks by President Trump at Values Voter Summit
Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington, D.C.
October 12, 2019


Straight Line of the Day: ‘Plastics’ Was the Advice in “The Graduate.” What Would Be Your One-Word Advice to Next Year’s Graduates?

Straight Line of the Day: ‘Plastics’ was the advice in “The Graduate.” What would be your one-word advice to next year’s graduates?