IMAO Time Machine: IMAO Podcast #7 7-11-05

The 7th podcast, from 2005. — The Editors


  1. Pre-introduction: SarahK the CPA
  2. Introduction & sponsors
  3. The IMAO crew goes to Iraq (Part 1)
  4. Harvey: Fun Facts About Connecticut (Part 1)
  5. PSA: Driver Safety
  6. Harvey: Fun Facts About Connecticut (Part 2)
  7. SarahK: She Blonded Me with Science
  8. “World of Knowledge” w/ host Frank J: Ninjas
  9. Frank Discourse (Roundtable): Terrorism (root causes, group therapy as a solution), Are we in the End of Times?, the Dave Matthews concert, Greg Gutfield, How to pimp the blog on Rush Limbaugh’s show, Frank & Sarah’s wedding
  10. Frank: Conclusion, listener emails
  11. The IMAO crew goes to Iraq (Part 2)

Getting Tired of Winning

“This [good economic news] also allows me the latitude and timing to take some of the horrible, incompetent, just terrible trade deals that have been made over the years, and make them great. It’s like “Make America Great Again” — make the trade deals great. I don’t know if I can use the word “again.” Make them great. Period. Because I don’t think they were ever any good. (Laughter.)

. . .

“They passed the disastrous trade deals that encouraged the shuttering of American plants and the offshoring of American jobs by the millions. In short, the failed political class sold out American workers, sold out American prosperity, and sold out the American Dream.

“This was the alarming situation I was elected to end. And ending, it’s never that easy. And you see that. You do have people that want to keep it going that way, but they’re losing and they’re losing now rapidly and fast. Those days are gone, and we’re not going back.

“As you know, one of the key insights of economics is the power of incentives. Unlike past leaders, my goal is to ensure that this power works for America’s favor and for America’s workers and for America’s companies. We want the incentives created by our tax, trade, regulatory, and energy policies to be pro-growth, pro-worker, and 100 percent pro-American. And more is yet to come.”

Remarks by President Trump at the Economic Club of New York, November 12, 2019


“Brink’s”manship

Elizabeth Warren’s Tax Plan Would Bring Rates Over 100% for Some
Wall Street Journal | November 15, 2019 | Richard Rubin

Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has unveiled sweeping tax proposals that would push federal tax rates on some billionaires and multimillionaires above 100%.

That prospect raises questions for taxpayers and the broader economy that experts are starting to ponder:

Under which circumstances would taxpayers have to pay those rates?

How might that change their behavior?

And would investment and economic growth suffer?


Choirlusion? Coeur d’Illusion? Anyway, It’s Nice.

Russian Specialists May Help Restore Notre Dame in Paris
Interfax | 11/14/19

Specialists from Russia will participate in the restoration of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, the Russian president’s envoy for international cultural cooperation Mikhail Shvydkoy said, adding that a final decision on this issue will be made in January.

“We will make a final decision in January because we are now awaiting an official request and an official invitation from France. I hope this invitation will arrive before the New Year. And in mid-January, we will meet with the special ambassador of France who is in charge of recruiting foreign specialists to work on this project,” Shvydkoy told reporters on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Cultural Forum on Thursday.

A final decision will be adopted after such an invitation is received, he said.

“We need to understand what the French need. We have lots of specialists who work with stone and wood. I mean the specialists who know how such castle-type constructions can be restored,” Shvydkoy said.

According to earlier media reports, specialists from Russia will be invited to France to help rebuild the Notre Dame Cathedral.

The Illustrated Walrus: The Pitch

Based on something Walrus said.

.

AMERICA: So, what have you come up with?

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Well, we’ve thought about this in a variety of ways. But the basic idea is Trump, being himself, . . .

ADAM SCHIFF: (Interrupting) May I?

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Go ahead.

ADAM SCHIFF: I think I can sum up this impeachment for you with one word: “NOTHING.”

AMERICA: Nothing?

ADAM SCHIFF: (Smiling) Nothing.

AMERICA: (Unimpressed) What does that mean?

ADAM SCHIFF: The impeachment is about nothing.

HOUSE COMMITTEE: (To Schiff) Well, it’s not about nothing.

ADAM SCHIFF: (To Committee) No, it’s about nothing.

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Well, maybe in philosophy. But, even nothing is something.

(Committee and Schiff glare at each other. The press enters.)

PRESS: America, Keeping Up With The Kardashians is on TV.

AMERICA: I’ll watch later.

(Press leaves)

ADAM SCHIFF: (Attempting to pronounce Latin) Quid Pro Quo?

AMERICA: Not even close.

ADAM SCHIFF: Was it with a Russian?

AMERICA: No.

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN: What’s the premise?

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Well, as I was saying, Trump being himself, as an outsider, from New York, has an agenda, a following, and a hot wife, which is all true.

ADAM SCHIFF: Yeah, but nothing happens that can’t be grounds for impeachment. You see, it’s just his life. You know, he eats, he goes campaigning, he speaks … He eats, he campaigns, he makes a phone call.

AMERICA: He made a phone call? You have a transcript?

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Well, I don’t know about the transcript… We didn’t discuss any transcript.

AMERICA: All right, tell me, tell me about the stories. What kind of first-hand knowledge?

ADAM SCHIFF: Oh, no. No first-hand knowledge.

AMERICA: No first-hand knowledge? So what is this?

ADAM SCHIFF: (Showing an example) What’d you do today?

AMERICA: I got up and came to work.

ADAM SCHIFF: There’s an impeachment. That’s impeachment.

AMERICA: (Confused) How is that impeachment?

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Well, uh, maybe something happened when he got to work.

ADAM SCHIFF: No, no, no. Nothing happened.

HOUSE COMMITTEE: Well, something happened.

AMERICA: Well, why am I watching it?

ADAM SCHIFF: Because it’s going to bring down Trump.

AMERICA: Not yet.

The Anglo-Swedish War

This weekend marks the anniversary of the beginning of the Anglo-Swedish war.

Never heard of it? Well, mostly because it’s a war that didn’t really happen.

Oh, it’s real. On November 17, 1810, Sweden declared war on the United Kingdom.

Sweden and the U.K. were allies, but in 1810, when Sweden lost a war with France — the U.K. had it’s own little off and on war with France going on, but it was a separate war. As a result of Sweden’s defeat, France was actually running things. They demanded that Sweden declare war on the U.K. so they did. They just never got around to fighting.

Sweden allowed the U.K. to occupy an island that was used as a base for smuggling. That was okay with Sweden because the U.K. was such a huge trading partner that when France insisted all trade stop, it did. Well, all the legal trade. Sweden kept on doing business, but called it British smuggling and never managed to stop any of it, on purpose.

The war finally ended a couple of years later with some other treaty.

That’s how you do a war.