Follow the Science (Part 2): Just the Vaxx, Ma’am

I’ve always been squeamish about needles. I can’t even watch injections on TV. Once, I gave blood because it seemed like a good thing to do, and the next thing I knew a nurse was holding my head up off the floor and asking me if I was conscious.

This, more than anything else, has probably contributed to my not being a heroin junkie.

But, getting to vaccines, I’m not an absolutist. I assume that the measles and polio ones work, and are notable success stories. The ones for the flu have to change every year, since each year brings new strains, and they have to guess which of the several strains to guard against. My personal experience was that I only got the flu, in all my years, the one year I got the flu vaccine.

I don’t want this Covid vaccine. I see that people are getting adverse reactions, which is statistically common and expected, so that’s not my reason. My reason is that I would rather get the real Covid than some scientist-manufactured version, because I trust my biological system’s defense against God’s handiwork more than its defense against man’s.

(This raises the question of whether Covid-19 is indeed God’s handiwork and not the Chinese’s, as I suspect, so I’ve got to work that out.) A plastic solution to a plastic disease doesn’t sound like the answer, to me.

Now, they say you have to get two injections to fight this year’s plague, and after that boosters, and then other injections in each year, since it can mutate. This is not for me. There have been no long-term studies of these new vaccines — by definition.

Very well, once they recommend getting vaccinated regularly every year (a regimen I don’t care for), my fear is that it will become mandatory, in order to keep your job. This, in my view, is an unreasonable intrusion into your private life.

The second vaccine injection is supposed to be administered three weeks after the first. How the scientists came up with that time frame, I don’t know, but can guess. However, in England, due to a shortage of vaccine supply, they are extending that second shot to three months after the first. This does not sound like science to me.

COVID-19: Second Dose of COVID Vaccines To Be Given Later After Guidelines Change
SKY News | December 30, 2020

The second dose of the coronavirus vaccines will be given later than originally planned, experts have said.

The move is to ensure more people are given a first dose to help fight the UK’s rising coronavirus infection rate, with the second dose administered up to three months later.

Speaking at a briefing at Downing Street today, Professor Wei Shen Lim, chair of the Joint Committee of Vaccinations and Immunisations, said the “immediate urgency” was for the rapid rollout of the new Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine and to ensure high levels of uptake.

“We recommend delivery of the first vaccine should be prioritised for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.

Professor Sir Munir Pirmohamed, chair of the Commission on Human Medicine Expert Working Group which looked into the efficacy and safety of the new vaccine, said it was 80% effective three months after the first dose.

He added: “We examined the half-dose regime but we felt that the results were not borne out by the full analysis.”

Follow the Science (Part 1): Which Is Way Behind the NSA

The Most Personal Device: Researchers Probe How Much Psychological Data Smartphones Generate
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich via Phys.org | 5/17/2020

Everyone who uses a smartphone unavoidably generates masses of digital data that are accessible to others, and these data provide clues to the user’s personality. Psychologists at LMU are studying how revealing these clues are.

For most people around the world, smartphones have become an integral and indispensable component of their daily lives. The digital data that these devices incessantly collect are a veritable goldmine—not only for the five largest American IT companies, who make use of them for advertising purposes. They are also of considerable interest in other contexts.

For instance, computational social scientists utilize smartphone data in order to learn more about personality traits and social behavior. In a study that appears in the journal PNAS, a team of researchers led by LMU psychologist Markus Bühner set out to determine whether conventional data passively collected by smartphones (such as times or frequencies of use) provide insights into users’ personalities.

The answer was clear cut.

“Yes, automated analysis of these data does allow us to draw conclusions about the personalities of users, at least for most of the major dimensions of personality,” says Clemens Stachl, who used to work with Markus Bühner (Chair of Psychological Methodologies and Diagnostics at LMU) and is now a researcher at Stanford University in California.

Heck, They May Even Become Quadruplefins

Fish Sex Organs Boosted Under High CO2
University of Adelaide via Phys.org / 12/30/20

Research from the University of Adelaide has found that some species of fish will have higher reproductive capacity because of larger sex organs, under the more acidic oceans of the future.

Published in PLOS Biology, the researchers say that far from the negative effects expected under the elevated CO2 levels in our oceans predicted for the end of the century, these fish capitalise on changes to the underwater ecosystems to produce more sperm and eggs. They also look after them better, enhancing the chances of reproductive success.

“The warming oceans absorb about one-third of the additional CO2 being released into the atmosphere from carbon emissions, causing the oceans to acidify,” says lead author Professor Ivan Nagelkerken from the University’s Environment Institute and Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories.

“We know that many species are negatively affected in their behaviour and physiology by ocean acidification. But we found that in this species of temperate fish — the common triplefin — both males and females had larger gonads under conditions of ocean acidification. This meant increased egg and sperm production and therefore more offspring.”

The team used natural volcanic CO2 underwater seeps to compare ecosystems with the levels of CO2 that are predicted for the end of this century with fish communities living under today’s ‘normal’ levels of CO2.

They found that there were no negative effects of ocean acidification for the triplefins. The larger gonads did not come at a physiological cost.

“We found males were eating more. They showed intensified foraging on more abundant prey—which was more abundant because of the increased biomass of algae that grows under the elevated CO2,” says Professor Nagelkerken.

“The females, on the other hand, did not eat more. They instead reduced their activity levels to preserve energy and then invested this in larger ovaries.

“We also found there were more mature males under elevated CO2 and, in this species where it is the males that take care of the eggs, that means we have more parents nurturing the egg nests, which could increase offspring.”

I’m skeptical, though: man-made global warming studies have never produced more mature males.

“That’s SO Gay!”

Oops — meant to schedule this for a later date. Oh well.

That statement is cause for a “high-five” on most network shows.

There are people who are allowed to say that. Yet, at the same time, people whose lives would be destroyed if they said that.

Let that sink in.

And rap lyrics: we’ve seen that a white person using the same lyrics as used in rap will be forced to apologize.

Let that sink in, too.

Happy New Year Poll

Is it over? Well 2020 is but the fun goes on. Your poll question is simple, what happens on January 6, 2021? Here are your options.

This poll is no longer accepting votes

On January 6th this will happen.

Poll closes on Tuesday January 5th at 11:00 pm.