Friday Night Open Thread: Morality Lecture

It has become quite a tradition in only three short weeks to lecture you about morality. But I’ve covered the Big Three already — not sinning, what to do with found money, and murder — and I think that about exhausts the subject, your patience, and myself.

The rationale for posting these on Friday nights was to enable you to hit the gound running on your Sabbath, no matter what your religion is. In Sunni/Shiite border regions, hitting the ground or running are the only two viable options. Seventh Day Adventists may be less violent, and on a different schedule with their Sabbath judging by their name, but I’ll examine that in due course.

What moral dilemmas remain that require attention? Well, there is an ongoing debate whether the ends justify the means. I won’t go into it, because it’s very complicated, and would probably only make me more exhausted. The short version: one ends up admitting both sides simultaneously — a mongrel position. Unless you are dogmatic; which is one step from being a curmudgeon.

Both sides being arguably right is known as cognitive dissonance. Dissonance, over time, achieves velocity; but that, too, changes over time. Which means (but doesn’t end) that it accelerates. Multiply this by the mass of people in this country, and it becomes a force.

A lot of people say physics and morality are incompatible, but then a lot of people bought a year’s worth of toilet paper when Covid hit. You know what they’re full of.

In The Federalist Papers (no. 44), James Madison — no hoarder himself, though he left behind a giant body of work that Democrats are still trying to bury — wrote:

“No axiom is more clearly established in law or reason than wherever the end is required, the means are authorized; wherever a general power do to a thing is given, every particular power for doing it is included.”

He almost certainly used “f”s for “s”s, but in any case this is now known as the doctrine of “Implied Powers.” Whilst Madison was focusing on the first word, Government gobbled that up and then dined with relish on the second. But Madison was referring only to the mechanisms of government, which are about as far from the definition of morality as one can get; and his axiom has been perverted in countless ways, which is as close to the definition of government as one can get.

Which means, of course, an end is justified.

.

Do you have something you’d like to share? A link? A joke? Some words of wisdom? A topic to discuss? It’s our nightly Open Thread, and you have the floor.

3
1

I Know It’s Not The Babylon Bee, But It’s Still One of the Funniest Things Ever Published

Ontario Activists Claim Ravines Are Racist
Post Millennial | April 22, 2021 | Roberto Wakerell-Cruz

A new analysis by The Globe and Mail‘s Urban Affairs reporter and Architecture Critic argues that race, gender, and economic status “can all be barriers” to Toronto’s free and publicly accessible green spaces.

The article asserts that Toronto’s ravines are only accepting of people’s different backgrounds and income levels “in theory,” and cites the case of black outdoorswoman Jacqueline L. Scott, who says that the lack of diverse faces makes it less likely for people of colour to go to green spaces—something that is sometimes called a self-fulfilling prophecy.

The article argues that concerns around [?] representation discourage “racialized people” [??] living near ravines from using their public backyards, and that hurdles such as a “lack of signs indicating where to enter a ravine” remain in place. [!!]

Ah HA HA HA!

Another barrier, according to University of Toronto doctoral student Ambika Tenneti, is that “people of colour communities like to sit and chat around,” an activity that is difficult to do in ravines, which are “generally trails.”

“You just have to walk and there’s no place to sit down or anything,” she says.

The Globe and Mail piece also lacks in originality.

A recent Los Angeles Times article also argued that “longtime oppression and historical barriers” were responsible for keeping people of colour “from feeling comfortable in American outdoors.”

Ah-HA HA HA! Stop it! Ba ha ha hah hah hahah !!!

You’re killing me!

Oh. That’s the idea.

Intelligence Failure

Biden in today’s press conference on Afghanistan:

“We know of no circumstance where Americans can’t get to the airport.”

That one sums up the entire administration. And press, since there was no follow-up question.

What’s up.

TGIF everyone, hope you got great plans for the weekend.

Speaking of great plans I want to take this opportunity to let you know of a new upcoming contest that will be premiering soon. Well as soon as I get it all together and ready.

You may remember this poll.

This poll is no longer accepting votes

Which do you prefer?

I know you do because you are the best, simply the best. Here is what I have planned.

I am going to set up a single elimination tournament for individual songs. The time period to be covered are the 1950s through the 2000s. It will cover Rock ‘n Roll and Country and Western. It will cover a lot ground. I hope to give you a week to vote and have two days a week for the contest. Right now that looks to be Wednesday and Friday. Hopefully that will work.

Further my plan is to use Billboard charts for the base of choosing the songs. Unless anyone can suggest a better starting point.

Now I know there are other styles out there like R&B, Jazz, Gospel and Rap but I am not really interested in including them as this is already going to be a huge list to start without them. But, if I can sense a desire for them, I will revisit that decision.

So, what do you guys think? Worth the effort?