Because he couldn’t pick a side . . . He isn’t for states’ rights; and he isn’t for a strong federal union of states, either. He’s got nothing against slavery of certain groups, per se; and he doesn’t want to hear that bit about “of the people, by the people, and for the people” again during his tenure in office, unless there are exemptions and carve-outs for him and his supporters.
The Cival War? First time I’ve heard about it.
Civil even. 😛
@1&2
either
That Dianny is snarky.
Why Obama didn’t go to Gettysburg —
Because he couldn’t pick a side . . . He isn’t for states’ rights; and he isn’t for a strong federal union of states, either. He’s got nothing against slavery of certain groups, per se; and he doesn’t want to hear that bit about “of the people, by the people, and for the people” again during his tenure in office, unless there are exemptions and carve-outs for him and his supporters.
@Oppo copied your reply to my FB page if that’s ok.
Trouble was, to fit his head, his “stovepipe” hat looked more like the entire stove.
@6: OK with me; public rant and all.
(1128??
I thought Kreuger would never allow there to be two tbones on the same web.)
(/seinfeld)
Obama won’t go to Gettysburg…Bonzo goes to Bitburg…. Hmmm….
I’ve no time for Gettysburg…I’m too busy selling out our nation to Iran. ~ BO, Washington DC.