We’re still negotiating inspections with Iraq, like we really care about inspections. They’re just an excuse to kill Saddam, and I hope we have plenty more excuses if they actually do allow inspections. Worst off, we could just kill Saddam and not have some articulated excuse (I mean, other than the “he’s evil and a murderer” which used to work before we all became so “sophisticated”).
And what’s with this Hans Blix character I’m now hearing about? That sounds like the name of a cartoon cat. I can’t believe that the grand and powerful United States is waiting on someone named Hans Blix. Let’s just drop an anvil on him and get in gear.
And then there’s the Democrats (I think they’re not interested in the security of the American people). Gebhardt said, “We don’t want to do something alone, or with one other country, and bypass the U.N. and then, three years from now, have China or India or Russia or somebody else say, ‘You did it, we can do it.”’ Little heads up to those countries: you aren’t’ the only superpower. You can’t use our excuses. And one of you – and I’m looking at China – are evil and have an illegitimate government, so you frankly aren’t allowed to do anything without getting our permission first.
And the Sen. Carl Levin warned how military leaders think that Iraq will be more likely to use WMD’s if we attack without a coalition. That’s dumb on so many levels. First of all, we’re to believe that military people talked to a Democrat. Military people hate Democrats because all they do is whine and take away funding from the military (if the military had funding, that would help with the security of the America people, and the Democrats aren’t interested in that). And, Iraq is rational enough to know that the threat difference between America by itself and America with France behind it is infinitesimal.
I say leave inspection in Iraq to archeologist two thousand years in the future.