Via Breitbart.
I’ve never actually watched an entire segment of Chris Matthews, but from the many clips I’ve seen, I get the impression it would sound a LOT like this:
Via Breitbart.
I’ve never actually watched an entire segment of Chris Matthews, but from the many clips I’ve seen, I get the impression it would sound a LOT like this:
MSNBC called to offer the animated liberal
a regular guest commentator spot on Maddow,
Must be arguing at the liberal’s house. There are only three books on an otherwise empty bookcase. And her bun is wound a little too tightly.
As Dennis Prager points out when you disagree with a Liberal that can be for one reason, you are a SIXHIRB (six herb). Depending on the argument, you are a sexist,intolerant, xenophobe, homophobe, islamophobe, racist, bigot.
Since liberals don’t arrive at a conclusion through reason, reason is incapable of changing a liberal mind. Liberals adopt liberalism to feel good and, just like when you deny a toddler a toy, to resist is to be called the seat of all evil.
You can’t argue with an idiot!
Why would anyone argue with a liberal? Does someone actually care what they think?
Son of Bob:
No, nobody cares what they think… but sometimes it’s fun to argue with them just to make them squirm. I once got in a debate about Israel vs Palestinians, and when I refused to budge on the fact that the territory belongs to Israel, the girl I was arguing with literally ran away crying. Just try to tell me that doesn’t sound like a good time!
Breitbart’s take is pretty good, but he left out at least one favorite liberal debate technique. It goes like this:
Well, what about [name some conservative or Republican]?
In the liberal mind, bad behavior always justifies bad behavior when it is liberal bad behvavior or decisions justified by previous bad Republican behavior, which at the time committed, was excoriated with an unhinged vehemence by the left. This applies to the Bush spending increases, Congressional corruption, Clinton crimes, etc.
On the other hand, Republicans are usually pretty happy to eat their own young, or at least banish them, when corruption arises.
Following up on Burmashave:
“Well, Bush did all those bailouts & stimuli”.
Yup, and Republicans got their collective asses handed to them in 2008 because of it. But liberals cite it to excuse their own spending.
Leave it to a liberal to mistake a colossal blunder for a sensible justification.
Yeah, I’ve had this conversation.
Gotta love liberals the only thing missing is a good old fashioned nananana I can’t hear you defense.
I’m not a psychologist but I pretend to be one and I’m pretty sure that’s part of the denial mechanism….multiple bad arguments…..that all sounded rational when they heard it while taking bong hits.
BTW I’ve gotta man crush on Breitbart. That guy stopped a protest all by himself and he didn’t need dinosaurs with missiles backing him up……although I’m sure that would have sped things up.
Watching liberals argue is like watching baby chicks deal with issues of diversity.
Arguing with liberals is a waste of time. Best thing is to just laugh and point at them. They hate that.
Ron Paul 2012!
@Lolziter,
Teacher says, “Every time a liberal cries an angel gets his wings.”
The only unrealistic part was the fact that the liberal maintained a monotone voice throughout; in my experience, when confronted with logic and reason, liberals get louder and begin to screech in defense.
Interesting facts about Social Security:
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary.
Now: No longer voluntary.
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the program,
Now: 7.65% on the first $90,000.
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year.
Now: No longer tax deductible.
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security retirement program, and no other government program.
Fact: During Johnson’s presidency, the money was moved to the General Fund and spent.
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Result: Under Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed.
Many have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that they are getting taxed on 85% of the money they paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which political party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democrat controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which political party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democrat Party.
Q: Which political party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democrat Party, with Al Gore casting the tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President.
Q: Which political party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! JIMMY CARTER and the Democrat Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democrat Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it.
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
What a great idea! Screw you Democrats, liberal or not.
“Now: 7.65% on the first $90,000”
NO!
The employer pays that much, too,
so the SS Tax rate is over 15%,
as anyone who pays Self Employment Tax knows.
Sorry for the cheery news.
Uncanny. If you could only punch the hippies in the face.
Ah liberals, never confuse the issue with facts and keep talking. Sooner or later they’ll get tired and walk away.
Well, just like Chris Matthews, I couldn’t watch the whole thing. Did anything interesting happen in the second half? Maybe somebody got shot or knifed or something?
too bad the creator of this couldn’t make it more realistic by putting some sort of libtard thing on the girl’s shirt… like a picture of che, or W w/ a hitler ‘stache & devil horns, or “buck fush” …you know, the usual stuff
Bravo Breitbart!
When it comes to facing the Liberal Wall, aka the knee jerk body of assumptions, humoUr is about the only refuge left.