Year by year, some of the great posts in IMAO history:
______________
2002 – Frank’s other plan for world peace.
2003 – The first lie ever told about Glenn Reynolds on the internet.
2004 – Frank vs. the Limey. Some troll from England sent Frank hate mail. So Frank mocked it merciessly. You’d think the Limey would learn his lesson, but apparently he acquired some sort of brain disease from eating bad crumpets. Frank had to beat him up 10 times before he finally went away. The link above is to part 10, and links to the other 9 encounters can be found there.
2005 – Frank turns IMAO into a group blog. Panic ensues amongst the readership.
2006 – The last lie ever told about Glenn Reynolds on the internet.
2007 – The first lie ever told about John Edwards on the internet.
2008 – The last lie ever told about John Edwards on the internet.
2009 – Not having The Limey to kick around, Frank starts a flame war with Fark. Petty Farkers rate the post 400 times trying to make it look bad, little realizing that no one who reads IMAO bases their decision on post-ratings. As Frank said, “what a gaggle of morons.”
2010 – Say, are the Democrats still using that new logo and “Change That Matters” motto?
2011 – Romney 2012 Slogans. As far as I know, the Romney campaign has yet to improve on these. Or the even better ones that got left in the comments.
______________
Good stuff man…
Yeah, at one time, we were really anti-Romney around here… except for a few resident Mormons. And except for a few, it had nothing to do with his Mormonism.
A man’s professed religion has nothing to do with whether he can be trusted to keep his word, so personally I couldn’t care less about Romney’s
Heh, heh, heh. I just read through the fark thread, and man was that a good time. A bunch of them got pissed off by me suggesting that the Obamacare death panels should target liberals instead of old people.
There’s nothing more fun than watching a bunch of semi-literate, fragile libtards get their panties all in a bunch and break down in nervous crying.
A man’s professed religion has nothing to do with whether he can be trusted to keep his word
Satanists, Socialists, and radical Muslims notwithstanding?
But I beg to differ…
A man’s professed religion, fully adhered to, is a guide to his trustworthiness.
It didn’t, and doesn’t, matter to the great majority of Dem politicians from JFK onward. (Speaker McCormack excluded.) JFK was hardly adherant to his faith and hardly trustworthy. Carter? Clinton? (Remember that suitcase-sized KJV Bible he carried?) Obama? Would you trust your wife, daughter or son to their care if you were called out of town on business? (Provided, in this job climate, you still had business to go to.)
It is not just religion stated, but faith, humbly, manifested which should be a signal index.
Obama is, without question, a hypocrite as a Christian.
Extra ecclesiam, nulla salvus.
I wonder whatever happened to that Limey. His head probably exploded when the Tories won Parliament.