4 Comments

  1. Just curious, anybody else think that these researchers are unfit for only using 600 kids to represent all the kids in the U.S.? I mean, that makes this study seem pretty weak to me.
    Statistics are a fine indicator that real science is needed, but anyone that takes them as real science is a dope.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.