8 Comments

  1. “We are told the scientists are using data from 1,500 temperature stations. Years ago, there were over 6,000 temperature stations. What happened to the other 4,500 stations?
    “In Russia, they are complaining the IPCC folks or the CRU folks in Great Britain failed to include temperature readings from… Siberia! One of the largest & coldest regions on the planet. Why?”
    -Anonymous

    “The data collected for AGW omitted more than 25% of the measurement stations located in the coldest 35% of the planet….ie…Siberia. Only one station is operating, and the measurements from that station were omitted from the study. A full quarter of the planet covered in ice was not factored into average temperatures.”

    – Anonymous

    #SuperSophisticated!

  2. @4 Oppo:

    Face it, if I want a tan and an umbrella in my drink, I’m heading to Sanibel Island not Siberia. You go where you will get the results you want! When there is money (especially government money) only in saying Global Warming does exist…Global Warming most surely does exist, no matter what has to be manipulated to make the research data work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.